Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.
Human beings are always seeking ways to improve their interactions with other people, and there are a great number of aspects that play in this matter. One of the important factors that play in this matter is honesty. In this regard, some people are of the opinion that telling truth in any condition is so vital, while others believe that we are being allowed to tell lies about some issues, which causes problems. I certainly agree with the first idea, that is, telling truth in any situation rather than the second one for two substantial reasons that will be presented hereunder.
First, in any relationship, reliability is one of the most considerable factors that we should evaluate people based on that. Reliability is the fruit of honesty, and with the passage of time, we can conclude that a person is reliable or not. In society, reliable people have many chances to progress, and without other requirements, they can reach their goals. For instance, many people believe that having capital for starting is so important, but in my opinion, being reliable is so vital factor. When we look back on some well-known people's life, we can find that most of them lived in abject poverty, and they by showing some ethical values such as reliability paved the way for progress.
Second, sometimes, people face some problems that they think that there is no way except telling lies, but I have a contrary view against this view. There is a proverb in my culture that says “we must not tell lie, we are able to conceal the truth that causes a conflict among people.” According to this saying, we can get the fact that, sometimes, in only harsh conditions, we can use some strategies that prevent us from telling lies. We can use the strategy that most of politicians use. In this method, politicians instead of telling truth, easily conceal the truth. This method, also, is practical in our private life. The couples that face problems in their relationships that related to exaggerating in being honest, can use this strategy for overcoming their problems.
In conclusion, by considering all aforementioned reasons, we can conclude that honesty has a good number of fruits that one of them is reliability which plays a crucial role in people’s life. In addition, in hard conditions, we can use substitute ways for avoiding telling lies such as concealing the truth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 537, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...r. When we look back on some well-known peoples life, we can find that most of them liv...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 466, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the politicians') or simply say ''most politicians''.
Suggestion: most of the politicians; most politicians
...ling lies. We can use the strategy that most of politicians use. In this method, politicians instea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, second, so, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 25.0 11.0286738351 227% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1972.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 403.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89330024814 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63731675413 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516129032258 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0403064479 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7058823529 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88235294118 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228190065741 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079237290279 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680645257806 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136287526052 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396879880243 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.