At a sale at a private home in California several years ago,
The main topic of both the reading and the lecture is the photo negatives that have been found in a home. Based on the text, the author of the passage states that these negatives belong to Ansel Adams, and he or she provides three reasons to support their idea. However, the professor rejects the author's view.
First, according to the writing section, the author says that the negatives include images of landscapes, which are so similar to Ansel Adams' well-known works. One of the negatives displays a tree that has been shown in the other works of Ansel Adams. The lecturer, nevertheless, supports a contradictory view; he claims that it is true that that picture is so similar to Adams' works, but that tree was so famous and popular landmark in that place. Therefore, the image may be taken by another person.
Second, contrary to the belief in the reading that the handwriting of the envelops which was used to classify the envelopes belongs to Virginia Adams, Ansel Adams' wife since she helped him organize these negatives, The lecturer mentions that Virginia was an educated person, and she grew up in a famous family, so it is unlikely he wrote that handwriting because those are full of spelling mistakes.
Finally, the author of the passage describes that negatives were damaged by fire, and also, it is famous that Adams' studio was also fired in that period of time, so it is likely that these negatives belong to Adam. The lecturer, in contrast, refutes this explanation. He believes that, in that period, the firing of studios was so common since all studies used chemical materials that were so flammable, and their works were usually damaged by fire.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 147, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...hat Adams studio was also fired in that period of time, so it is likely that these negatives b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, well, in contrast, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 12.0772626932 174% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 22.412803532 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 286.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83566433566 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46171973665 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527972027972 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 97.4201940815 49.2860985944 198% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.727272727 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 21.698381199 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0909090909 7.06452816374 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.00752742427375 0.272083759551 3% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00438045977499 0.0996497079465 4% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0138522300877 0.0662205650399 21% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00637564818302 0.162205337803 4% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0110429465842 0.0443174109184 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.