Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.
In the history of mankind, there are quite a few jobs in which people earn legal and illegal income. One of the valuable and legal jobs is being a teacher. Although teachers' income is not usually high, but their income is so priceless. In any period of time, there are different approaches to teachers’ position in society from social-position to income, and their roles in society. One issue about teachers’ job is comparing teachers’ value in the past and in the present time. In my opinion, teachers’ value is far higher in the past than the present time. I will explain my viewpoint through two outstanding reasons.
First, in the past, there were fairly less educated people than now, and teachers’ positions were more valuable than now. In that time, living situation was so more different than today’s life, and people’s jobs were always blue-collar jobs. Therefore, a small proportion of the people were able to read and write necessary scientific materials, and their only source of knowledge was teachers for science. In contrast, in today’s lives, a high percentage of the people is educated people, and, because of the developments in communication technology, every person can find any topic in any field by pressing a few keys on the keyboards, and find valuable information from the Internet. Hence, today’s technology breaks teachers’ monopoly in information and science. As a result, their value becomes less than the past.
Second, earlier, people were far more religious than now, and people, who were able to read and write, were mostly concentrated in schools that depend on churches and religious centers. The teachers of these kinds of schools were usually priests, and not only were they the leader of their religious ceremonies but also were the manager of these kinds of schools, as a result, their positions were far more respected by people because of their religion and educational activities. Additionally, in the past, humans' knowledge was limited in the Bible and rudimentary science such as simple math, physics, and biology, to name but a handful, and any person who know these ordinary issues, became well-known as ‘scientist’, and he or she were respected by people On the other hand, today’s schools are often secular, and religion and education are separated from each other. Therefore, teachers were respected only for their knowledge and scientific abilities rather than their jobs. Apart from, todays’ teachers, because of the development of the distribution of science, are supposed to be experts in their field in one aspect, and it might reduce their value in our communities.
In conclusion, the small number of educated people and the concentration of schools in the religious centers are the most significant factors of teachers' respect in the past. In my view, teachers have to be more respected than other jobs, since their duties are very crucial in our society, and if we do not notice their position and respect, we will have problems in our the next generations.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement At universities and colleges sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans88
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to sc73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Universities and colleges sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME
Message: Use simply 'period'.
...ut their income is so priceless. In any period of time, there are different approaches to teac...
Line 2, column 175, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
... living situation was so more different than today’s life, and people’s jobs were al...
Line 4, column 395, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...e problems in our the next generations.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, second, so, therefore, well, apart from, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result, in my opinion, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 15.1003584229 212% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 30.0 13.8261648746 217% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2552.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 497.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13480885312 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82557875906 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460764587525 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 780.3 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 14.0 1.86738351254 750% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 15.0 4.94265232975 303% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 88.586384394 48.9658058833 181% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.6 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.85 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 5.45110844103 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225536781893 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0838393765227 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636011165345 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147894681115 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268339637614 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.