Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Whether teachers were more appreciated and valued in the past than nowadays is a heated discussed topic in the school recently. While some of the people believe that teachers were more grated and valued in modern society than past. I disagree with the idea because of the following reasons.
There were less knowledge sources and populations in old society than now which is a key reason why teachers were more appreciated in old times. To elaborate, there were far fewer people could get educated in the past. With only a little money saved at home for many people, it was impossible for them to get their kids educated. Students felt much more grateful for teachers in the past than now because the opportunity of getting educated was rare. Since there were only a few people could be educated, teachers and students had better relationships in the past. They tended to feel more grateful for teachers.
The social status of teachers was higher because knowledge sources and job opportunities were less in the past. To begin with, there were far fewer means for people to get information in old days. Education from teachers was a significant way for everyone to increase their knowledge. So teachers were valuable when people wanted to increase their knowledge capacity. In the meantime, there were fewer jobs, and teachers were fewer in people who had a job. It was likely that people who had a formal job possessed a higher social status in the past than now. There was no doubt that being a teacher was a formal job, so teachers had a superior social status.
In conclusion, having fewer knowledge sources in old times and a superior social status are the reasons why I think teachers were more appreciated and valued in the past than nowadays.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Whether teachers were more appreciated a...
^^
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...sed topic in the school recently. While some of the people believe that teachers were more ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ea because of the following reasons. There were less knowledge sources and po...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to feel more grateful for teachers. The social status of teachers was higher...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...achers had a superior social status. In conclusion, having fewer knowledge so...
^^
Line 7, column 25, Rule ID: FEWER_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'less knowledge'?
Suggestion: less knowledge
...cial status. In conclusion, having fewer knowledge sources in old times and a superior soc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, i think, in conclusion, no doubt, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 43.0788530466 28% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1977.66487455 74% => OK
No of words: 301.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86046511628 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50635333584 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 212.727598566 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.441860465116 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 461.7 618.680645161 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.305393811 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0588235294 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7058823529 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.64705882353 5.45110844103 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286399490191 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115594672965 0.076458572812 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076962672937 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233432139917 0.150856017488 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0982508860739 0.0645574589148 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 86.8835125448 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.