frog
The reading mainly talks about many frog species have declined in numbers and some are even extinct. Several methods proposed to help solve the problem. However, the listening challenges what is stated in the passage by providing three strong reasons. Firstly, in the reading, it is said that frogs are killed by pesticides and other chemicals. lf laws prohibit farmers from using pesticides near frogs, it would reduce the harm of pesticides cause to frogs. In contrast, the listening holds a view that prohibiting pesticides is not economically practical. To state it more clearly, it will cause severe disadvantage for farms to plant, farmers may loss crops if they don't use pesticides. Secondly, the passage asserts that antifungal medication and other treatments will help prevent frogs from infection. However, the woman maintains an opposite opinoin that using medication is not practical because it is needed for every single frog. It's impossible to use medication in large scale. If the frogs have offspring, we'll need to use medication on their offspring again. Finally, the author believed that frogs' habitates are under threaten because of human activities. But the woman believed that frog habitates are threatened by global warming rather than human. So it's useless to prevent human activity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 346, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Lf
...lled by pesticides and other chemicals. lf laws prohibit farmers from using pestic...
^^
Line 1, column 670, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...o plant, farmers may loss crops if they dont use pesticides. Secondly, the passage a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1100.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 207.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31400966184 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67443557816 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.63768115942 0.540411800872 118% => OK
syllable_count: 344.7 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.502226255 49.2860985944 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.5714285714 110.228320801 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7857142857 21.698381199 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.09492273731 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307813888842 0.272083759551 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110085866593 0.0996497079465 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111290139375 0.0662205650399 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.307813888842 0.162205337803 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.