Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Traveling is one of the most interesting ways to expand our knowledge about culture, tradition, history and other features of a country. If someone travels to a country, he/she will wonder that what he/she should do to study about that country. In my point of view, I suggest he/she should visiting museums. I totally agree with the statement that visiting museums is the best way to study about a country.

First of all, there are many different types of museums in a country like historical museum, art museum, cultural museum and so on. Each of them represents an aspect of a country. If you really yearn to explore a country, you should learn characteristics of that country like tradition, history, culture, etc. Therefore, no place is better than museums for that purposes. For example, when a friend of mine from Belgium, Eric, went to Vietnam, he brought a guide book about Vietnam. He told me that “The guide book is good but it is boring, because I really don’t want to just read a book. I can do it anywhere, but now I’m in Vietnam and I want something more interesting”. On the next couples of days, he leaved the guide book and went to museums. And of course, he absolutely had nothing to regret with his decision.

Second, I think that visiting museums is the best enjoyable and effective way to study about a country. In museums, we can see a lot of pictures and other things with very detailed descriptions about culture, history, traditions, etc of a country. We also are easy to understand about them by the representations of the museum’s guides. There is some information that you will never able to find them successfully if you don’t go to museums. For instant, when I traveled to China last year, I searched much information about China in the internet. I though the information that I had found is sufficient for me to know China. But I totally changed my mind when I went to a historical museum in Beijing. That museum has so many interesting things about China that I didn’t know. Along with some stories about Chinese tradition and culture, told by my friends, I had to admit that the time in museum is the most interesting time of my trip in China.

In summary, visiting museums will not only help us to explore many features of a country, but also it is the interesting way to study about that country. Therefore, in my view, if someone asks me which best way to discover a country, I will suggest visit the museums is far better.

Votes

Essay Categories

Independent TOEFL Writing

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 25, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...t a country. First of all, there are many different types of museums in a country like hist...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 197, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'which the best'.
Suggestion: which the best
...erefore, in my view, if someone asks me which best way to discover a country, I will sugge...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, really, second, so, therefore, for example, i think, in summary, of course, first of all, in my view

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 63.0 43.0788530466 146% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2044.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 439.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65603644647 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70933523267 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.451025056948 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 630.9 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8308276009 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1666666667 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2916666667 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231949191209 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734164714704 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077973107183 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153386574098 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204064893166 0.0645574589148 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.