are you agree or disagree that companies should pay for education employees
Having education and literacy is one of the most important factors in every society. Because of to possess the high level of education creates different advantages in societies. Such as having up level of culture and nice social conducts. Along with progression in variety basic science like medicine and economic are ensued of level society educations. About this theory that companies should pay for education employees I disagree with that and I will state my idea by two reasons:
The first I believe universities give defect information about different fields to students. Even sometimes the majority of instructions that teach aren’t necessarily for the genuine workplace and subsequently, when people enter to work environment they often have no enough expertise for their tasks. For instance when I was a bachelor student and I came to a factory for the first time as an apprentice. Even I didn’t know the accurate name of laboratory tools. While I was a good student in my course degree.
The second place, on the other hand, if expenses of employee education spend for encourage them, it may be more effective on their endeavor to enhance their ability. In fact instead of education in university which necessarily can’t be effective for strengthening abilities of employees if the employees have enough motivation and they are encouraged by the award and promote degree. To create a new space for attempt and compete employees. All of they in competition space can achieve to valuable experience that it’s not obtained in any university just by reading books.
Consequently, I believe pay for education employee isn’t good idea because the universities course often give not ample information for vocations and true experience are achieved in the workplace, not into the books. And along with spend expenses for practical teaching course and to make competition between employees are more effective for improving their expertise and abilities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ost important factors in every society. Because of to possess the high level of educati...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 484, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and I will state my idea by two reasons: The first I believe universities give de...
^^^
Line 2, column 475, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... the accurate name of laboratory tools. While I was a good student in my course degre...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oving their expertise and abilities.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, may, second, so, then, while, even so, for instance, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 314.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35987261146 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95046979635 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557324840764 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.9671443442 48.9658058833 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.2 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289188800742 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833438016209 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832896358313 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173868342527 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630696055837 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 58.1214874552 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.1575268817 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.