arts

Essay topics:

arts

Both artists and athletes are precious assets for a country, but when it comes to the question that whether governments should invest in either of arts or athletics, it brings up controversial doubts so that opinions vary from person to person. Many hold the opinion that it has more importance to spend money in the related fields of art while others believe that athletics should get more attention. Personally, I, to a huge extent, think that Olympic teams should receive more attention. Among countless reasons which can vindicate my point of view, I will explicate two conspicuous ones through the following essay.

The first reason that immediately comes into my mind is that they are representative of a country. For example, when teams attend some international competitions, a way that they are dressed up and as a whole, a way that they are looked like is important since they represent society to others. This example can shed more light on the issue. So the authorities should take into consideration to allocate a necessary budget to them.

The second reason that makes me hold this opinion is that the success of the Olympic teams of a country is a victory for that country. To be more specific, when teams in Olympic games achieve gold medals, indeed, they raise their country's flag among all other countries' flags attending the matches. As a recently conducted a survey in my country, tracking people's opinions about the assignment of the fund on art fields or athletics-related fields indicates that for people athletics achievement is more momentous.

To wrap the argument, if we take a glance into advantages of spending money in support of the Olympic teams instead of the art fields, it will be soon recognized that it is more worthwhile, as the members of teams show the entire members of a country to others, and their success brings pride to a whole country.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 246, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many holds'.
Suggestion: Many holds
...at opinions vary from person to person. Many hold the opinion that it has more importance...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, second, so, while, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 319.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94984326019 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78732924357 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.4423142154 48.9658058833 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.583333333 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5833333333 20.6045352989 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128296049289 0.236089414692 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0453170371991 0.076458572812 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647591792436 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0851448604093 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554275855066 0.0645574589148 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.