Call over phone or text? Which one would you prefer and why?
In today's modern world, technology is booming and everyday a new discovery is taking place. As a result, human are equiped with multiple gadgets. One popular and rapidly expanding device is telephone which is updating various exciting and advanced technology for people to communicate. With the discovery of smart phones, humans can now communication via various modes, e.g., by call, by text message, by voice note, etc. However, some people believe it is preferable to call someone over the phone rather than dropping a text whereas others prefer texting over call. In my opinion it is better to text a person rather than calling suddenly. I support this idea for three reasons which I will illustrate in the following paragraphs.
First of all, the famous saying "Everything comes with a price" is applicable for people living in 21st century. To further explain, although technological advancements have made life easier, but this has lead to increased number of brainstorming sessions faced by humans everyday. As a resukt, people are keeping very busy. Thus it is advisable to text a person when you need to connect with them. For instance, at my work station there are several board meetings keeping me occupied all day. Thus, a personal call from my aunt during the working hour really distracts me. Hence, I would fail to focus on the conversation with her. Therfore, it is advisable to text rather than a sudden call.
Secondly, after conversation, a text message remains documented forever foe further information. To furthur explain, if the conversation is held between a group of people, it is encrypted and can be easily referred to for the next discussion. But a telephonic conversation cannot be preserved and people tend to forget the details of the discussion. For example, I prefer a text or a mail to connect with my boss so that the discussion is well documented for any further use.
Finally, a text mode of communication allows us to multitask. In current society, one must possess the skill of multitasking to be successful. Thus, while chatting with someone, we have the opportunity of completing other task, like cooking, laundry, catering to one's needs.
In conclusion, although the mobile phone has been a breakthrough and has lead to a paradigm shift in our society's mode of communication between one another, we must consider the receiver's preference before making a call. Because of the above mentioned reasons, it is preferable to text.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...modern world, technology is booming and everyday a new discovery is taking place. As a r...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... brainstorming sessions faced by humans everyday. As a resukt, people are keeping very b...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...a resukt, people are keeping very busy. Thus it is advisable to text a person when y...
^^^^
Line 7, column 264, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ask, like cooking, laundry, catering to ones needs. In conclusion, although the m...
^^^^
Line 9, column 179, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'receivers'' or 'receiver's'?
Suggestion: receivers'; receiver's
...tween one another, we must consider the receivers preference before making a call. Becaus...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, e.g., finally, first, hence, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, thus, well, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2083.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 408.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10539215686 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9477530639 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59068627451 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.94265232975 283% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.8492458116 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.7916666667 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.79166666667 5.45110844103 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300809437241 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702457382253 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825238876224 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150905364986 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0896150400135 0.0645574589148 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.