Call over phone or text messages
By and large, it is beyond doubt that communication is an integral part of people's social life. In this regard, the source is of paramount importance. With the advent of technology, there is no communication barrier and people can interact whenever they need. There are many schools of thought among scholars whether talking over the phone is better or through text messages. As for the writer's opinion, I subscribe to the idea of communicating through a phone call. To what follows, I will delve into the most crucial reasons to substantiate my viewpoint.
The first compelling reason corroborating my opinion is that people who do not know how to write can still talk to others via phone call. It is worth mentioning that not all people are educated. It is crystal clear that text messages demand writing in a certain language and illiterate people found it hard to do. Therefore, they will avoid and resist talking which will make them anti-social. Fortunately, with advancements in science, the problem has been solved by introducing calls on the phone. Vividly, to enhance their social skills, talking on a phone call is very convenient for them. By way of illustration, 5 years ago, My grandmother came to visit me in the United states of America. She knew how to speak English but she did not know how to write in English. She made a very nice friend in my town. She always could talk to her on call as she did not prefer to write. If she were to just message on phone, she would not have continued her friendship. This clearly illustrates my reason.
The second rationale behind my viewpoint is rooted in the fact that the feelings and tone of voice are better understandable on a phone call rather than on text messages. People's feelings are associated with their voice and identifiable. This is a natural phenomenon in humans to make them understand better for another person. With the help of call, people can clearly express what they are trying or intend to say as compared to messages through which the original expression of thought is not depicted. As a case in mind, last night, my mom texted me that if I want to go shopping with her. I replied that I do not want to go. She understood that I was angry with her because we had an argument about our father yesterday morning but in reality, I was not mad at her. I was just tired and I wrote simple words to refuse her. If we had talked on call, this would not have happened
By perusing the above paragraphs, one can infer although text messages do not invade the privacy of others by disturbing them, talking over the phone is the more convenient approach. For the sake of brevity, a couple of reasons are worth reiterating: first, communication on call is easy between illiterate people, secondly, talking on call helps people to understand communication better. As a writer, I vehemently urge people to make the use of phone calls more practical. By doing so, you can save yourself from the side effects of using your phone for a long period of time doing text messages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 388, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...er or through text messages. As for the writers opinion, I subscribe to the idea of com...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 813, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...She made a very nice friend in my town. She always could talk to her on call as she...
^^^
Line 7, column 564, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... effects of using your phone for a long period of time doing text messages.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, as for, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 82.0 52.1666666667 157% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2514.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 537.0 407.700716846 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68156424581 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81386128306 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69444454723 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 273.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508379888268 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 781.2 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 21.0 9.59856630824 219% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.7378954989 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.8 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.53333333333 5.45110844103 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326512935914 0.236089414692 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757434321468 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867144516859 0.0737576698707 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216592338559 0.150856017488 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662625005675 0.0645574589148 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.