Carved stone balls
In this set of materials, the reading passage postulates that there are different
theories about the purpose of carved stone balls which have been unearthed in
Scotland, and then it provides three of them. On the other hand, the lecture states
that all of the arguments mentioned in the passage are not convincing and then
gainsays each of them.
First and foremost, the writer in the passage asserts that since the carved stone balls
have some holes, so perhaps the holes were used to throw stones Therefore, they
could be utilized as a weapon to hunt or fight. Nonetheless, the lecture maintains
that varied kinds of weapons, for example, arrows, have a sign of where, whereas,
the carved stone not only did lack it, but it also has a cracked and flat surface. As
a result, it did not use to make use as a weapon.
Next, the professor in the lecture further points out that due to the fact that the
carved stone balls are comprised of various sorts of stones with different densities
such as sand, grain, and other types of stones, hence, they could not be used as a
part of a system of weights. These claims refute the writer's implications that
because the carved stone balls have a consistent size, accordingly, they might be a
piece of a system of measures.
Ultimately, the article wraps its arguments by declaring that the carved stone might
be utilized as social meaning. The speaker in the listening rebuts this point by
insisting that it is unlikely that they used for social purposes. This is owing to the
fact that not only they had different patterns, for instance, some of them are
complex and some of them are simple, but also in the past in Nile river cities, when
people died, their possess had been buried with them, however, it was not any
evidence of the carved stone balls. Thus, its idea can not be true.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 6, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...he other hand, the lecture states that all of the arguments mentioned in the passage are ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 22, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
... flat surface. As a result, it did not use to make use as a weapon. Next, the pro...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, hence, however, if, nonetheless, so, then, therefore, thus, whereas, for example, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 326.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73619631902 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33836510663 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518404907975 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 3.25607064018 338% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.1896617335 49.2860985944 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.363636364 110.228320801 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6363636364 21.698381199 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.9090909091 7.06452816374 197% => OK
Paragraphs: 24.0 4.09492273731 586% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393956975386 0.272083759551 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14959921133 0.0996497079465 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128486355318 0.0662205650399 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109982565109 0.162205337803 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.174853785322 0.0443174109184 395% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 11.0289183223 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.2008830022 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.