There is no shortage of debate whether it is better to support the environment or the entertainment. As far as I am concerned, the company should invest in protecting the nature rather than developing the arts. I cling to this outlook because of two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay
First of all, nature is not ours, we are from nature. So, we need to be really glad about it because of everything it gives us. Humans have destroyed ceaseless the environment, and I think that it is time to fix some problems such as pollution, automobile’s smog through invest in measures and projects which help to cope with these problems. If we keep doing the same, we will not have the same food source in the coming years. To clarify my point, let me take my town as an example, not many years ago, Marcabeli –an Ecuadorian town- underwent a shortage in lakes which may have been produced due to the pollution caused by the throwing of garbage and the massive abuse of water. It affected people and aquatic plants. As a result, people did not have water to satisfy their hygiene basic needs. The authorities made the decision to spend on water producers and other pieces of machinery in order to solve this problem. they achieved to bring back the water from Guayacanes river. This is how statal or particular companies can help to resolve environmental problems.
Secondly, there is a bunch of endangered species nowadays, so companies should be aware of this and give some money to protect those species because we cannot let them extinct. For instance, I was in Macrino –an Ecuadorian Zoo- yesterday. I was talking with the in-charge about the place’s history. He told me that before the zoo, he looked after a dozen of endangered species in his house. But, after a time, a great company helped him to create the zoo because it saw his will to take care of animals in need. This is how we can protect our animals without leaving them to die out.
To sum up, I strongly believe that a company should invest on the helping the environmental growth because it is our unique source of food and housing, and there are animals which hope for projects focus on giving them a life away from hunters.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 928, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...chinery in order to solve this problem. they achieved to bring back the water from G...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, may, really, second, secondly, so, for instance, i think, such as, as a result, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1841.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 394.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67258883249 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60957772454 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565989847716 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.4368933482 48.9658058833 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8947368421 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7368421053 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57894736842 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167391220473 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435668154932 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049346916099 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10889476605 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230386793287 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.