There is no doubt that nowadays, cooperating plays a crucial role in the projects. No one can deny the direct and indirect effect of working together on a project on accomplishment prosperity. Some people may hold the view that the colleagues should have same opinions regarding a determined plan. However, some others may take the opposite viewpoint and believe that various ideas will bring some essential benefits eventually. From my vantage point, the latter belief is right. In the subsequent paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons which aptly elucidate my idea.
The first point coming to mind in order to substantiate my standpoint is concerned with this issue that different perspectives could reinforce each other. When two persons with distinctive notions analyze a project, they can assess their viewpoint from every angle; therefore, it is an appropriate approach to modify or adjust their views. As a result, they are able to achieve a remarkable consequence finally. In such a situation, different ideas will improve the result of the project, even though it seems hard at the beginning.
Another reason which deserves some words here is that working with someone who possesses diverse opinion on the same plan than yours, will lead to attaining a power to enhance the insights and analysis of new approaches. By doing so, a chance will be created for your co-worker and you to improve your previous knowledge. From my own experience on a joint project in university, my colleague and I had a completely different idea for doing a plan regarding the mass transfer. The point was that we had passed this unit with different professors. This distinct ideas eventually help us to represent the best project at that time among the other students.
To put it briefly, to give a proper assessment of collaborating on a project, one should take into account the fact that the various perspectives will employ enhancement of the program. Moreover, it could change some of your wrong prior thoughts. Consequently, it is highly recommended that you ought to accept your boss request to operate with one of your co-workers with a tremendous distinction in your ideas.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, consequently, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, no doubt, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1836.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 360.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86056629117 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3959076527 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194967950543 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529866121626 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456560504038 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116075586243 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052972188306 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.