It is universally acknowledged that honesty is one of the most important human virtues. Nearly all the relationships are based on honesty and trust among people. However, white lies are acceptable under some circumstances, in a bid to realize certain purposes.
Not thoroughly being honest to our friends can relieve us from deeper grief sometimes. I still remember the day when I had to leave the Netherlands because my exchange period came to an end. That was gut-wrenching, since I had to say goodbye to all of my friends there and leave a part of my memory I treasured most behind. Long before my departure, Phoebe, my best friend there, asked me several times about my exact time of leaving, because she wanted to see me off. But what I thought was leaving alone without telling anyone. For me, it was much sadder to just see my best friends-especially the ones who spent the most time with me and brought me a lot of happiness-leave me at the airport. So I kept telling her that I had not yet decided when to leave, although I had already booked the ticket. I cannot say whether it was appropriate or not, but I did this because I didn't want to hurt both of us. Just as a famous writer Shiqiu Liang once said, "if you love your friend, don't see him off at the airport. That will hurt both you and him; pick him up at the airport when he comes to visit you next time instead, that is the best way."
In other time, besides, there is just no need to tell the truth to friends because it will ruin their confidence and initiative sometimes. Economics of the European Union was a course that attracts large number of exchange students. It required us to give presentations on the given papers every week during the tutorials. Since we came from different countries and had totally different knowledge backgrounds of European Union, some of us ran into problems when understanding several parts of the course. This would directly relate to the quality of our presentations, since these papers were the extension of what we learned during the lectures. Lucas, who came from Brazil and worked very hard not only during class but in his free time, got stuck at some points. Obviously, he didn't do well in the presentation and even made some opposite conclusions on financial infrastructure. But everyone saw his efforts and determination. After his presentation, we all gathered around him and congratulated him, telling him that he did a very good job and the presentation was a success. For us, it was better to hide the truth and encourage him, which might exert some positive impact on him and made him confident.
As a consequence, telling white lies to friends sometimes is appropriate and necessary.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 876, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...priate or not, but I did this because I didnt want to hurt both of us. Just as a famo...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 986, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ce said, 'if you love your friend, dont see him off at the airport. That will h...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ime instead, that is the best way.' In other time, besides, there is just no...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 782, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...got stuck at some points. Obviously, he didnt do well in the presentation and even ma...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, so, still, well, to tell the truth
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 72.0 43.0788530466 167% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2249.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 475.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73473684211 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84175904324 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555789473684 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 702.9 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4504533075 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7826086957 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.652173913 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.65217391304 5.45110844103 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0740951514675 0.236089414692 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0205894670429 0.076458572812 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402124084113 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0419623896552 0.150856017488 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038250835311 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.