Do you agree/disagree with the following statement?
A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught. Use specific examples and reasons to support your answer.
At the turn of the new century, with the development of human’s modern society and galloping rate of science and technology, Education sector is adapting more and more complexity. Some people are of the opinion that teacher’s compatibility with students is more important rather than excellent content knowledge. I personally believe that content mastery should be the apogee trait of an education professional. I hold this belief for certain reasons which I will explore in subsequent paragraphs.
Firstly, through content knowledge helps teacher to efficiently manage classroom. Most classrooms have heterogeneous group which is impossible to control if teacher is not effective. An educator needs to have in depth subject knowledge; so that she can easily get through the regular classroom lectures as well as question answer sessions. For instance, when I was in high school, my mathematics teacher was so efficient with her subject that students get so engrossed in her lecture that there was a pin drop silence in classroom. So, content knowledge is of utmost importance.
Secondly, well versed faculty can infuse passion in students for a particular subject by her in depth content knowledge. Teachers play vital roles in students’ lives especially during career selection. Each child is born with some skills and talents. Some students want to be scientist by studying science while others prefer to study commerce and do business in future. It is the duty of educators to provide students with such facilities and experiences so that they can explore their traits. For instance, my younger brother had aversions for mathematics subject since childhood but when he entered secondary level in high school, his perception changed and he started taking interest in mathematics. This change of mind was possible because of his mathematics teacher who takes keen interest in students and uses simpler methods of instruction.
Lastly, a well qualified teacher can improve the overall result of the class. Unlike other professions, teaching is not a cup of everyone’s tea. To bring out best from the students takes lot of energy, dedication and enthusiasm. Well trained teacher with expert knowledge of the subject help students with their doubts, questions, revision and career counseling. This will lead to improvement in their grades.
In the nutshell, compatibility comes naturally when students are provided with new knowledge, innovative learning techniques. So, prime focus should be on content knowledge of an instructor.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 360, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...refer to study commerce and do business in future. It is the duty of educators to provide...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2150.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44303797468 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92872113161 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579746835443 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 643.5 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.9017831753 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4782608696 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1739130435 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26086956522 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259702701491 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709872009058 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602734000593 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146368742776 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312318307551 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.