Do you agree with the following statement?
Raising the price of gasoline and electricity is the only effective way to save energy.
Today's modern world places a great deal of importance on saving energy. With this in mind, governments' officials and ordinary people often debate whether increasing the price of oil and gas is an effective tool for controlling their consumption or not. I, personally of the opinion that this is not a beneficial move for various reasons, two of which I shall touch upon in the following paragraphs to substantiate my perspective.
To begin with, any prohibitive action such as increasing price tend to have negative effect because it does not stem from will of citizen. Nowadays, government enacted numerous prohibitive laws which do not hold the values that they were supposed to. In spite of those laws, People are going to act against those laws to show their oppositions. For example, two years ago, Iranian government passed a law which prohibits individuals to walk their dogs in beach. After two years, there are more and more people taking their dog to beaches, even people who did not have dog in the past, join others to show their opposition to the law. In exchange, government should promote energy-efficient life style through the means that they control. For example, there should be informative tv program of the effect of carbon emission. Needless to say, the cumulative emission of carbon will result in intensifying greenhouse effect and make our climate warmer. This warmer climate is not suitable for lots of creature and even may cause extinction. This will convince people to engage in energy-efficient behavior which is good for their environment. Therefore, culture and lifestyle-centered behavior will have positive effect beyond our imagination.
Another point worth mentioning is that it is not fair to punish all citizen by increase in living prices resulted from high energy price. National resources of a country should be equally distributed among citizen. the rise in price of fuels and electricity bring along lots of rises in all sort of products. All products that needed to be shipped from one place to another are fall prey to this regulation, and their final price would be much higher. In this way, people who are not responsible for bad usage of energy may be punished even though they do not do anything wrong. Thus, it is not fair that they pay for others misuse of natural resources. There should be laws that fine ones who actually behave inappropriately. Therefore, this increasing in energy price will not produce efficient results.
To conclude, having considered all points discussed previously, I firmly believe that the rise in the price of gasoline and electricity is not the only effective way to save energy. This is because not only it results in negative behavior, but it also increases the overall cost of living.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 569, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'dogged'.
Suggestion: dogged
...o beaches, even people who did not have dog in the past, join others to show their ...
^^^
Line 3, column 991, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun creature seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of creatures'.
Suggestion: lots of creatures
...This warmer climate is not suitable for lots of creature and even may cause extinction. This wil...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...d be equally distributed among citizen. the rise in price of fuels and electricity ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, may, so, therefore, thus, for example, sort of, such as, in spite of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2323.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 458.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07205240175 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82464659087 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550218340611 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 733.5 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7868260106 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7916666667 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0833333333 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192449275705 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521225535441 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596599589234 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135832545562 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598919610239 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.