Imagine that you need to take a course next semester and must decide
between two professors to take it with. The first professor is very
interesting but has a strict grading policy. The second professor is boring,
but has an easy grading policy. Which professor would you prefer to take
the course with? Explain why
Today's modern society views education as a cornerstone to human civilization. With this in mind, education experts and individuals often debate whether the stern mentor is best suited to students educational needs or some other teachers. Personally, I would rather an energetic professor with strict grading policy for several reasons, two of which I shall touch upon to prove my perspective.
To begin with, a fun teacher will keep students motivated and encourage them to purse their interest. In this day and age of modernization, students hope is at minimum level. In order to be succeful in their future career they need to be encouraged and keep being motivated. An easy-going teacher will help student to explore fun things even in theoretical course of mathematics. In this manner one manages to keep student motivated and give them the extra push needed to pursue their obsessions. My own experience is a compelling example of this. When I was a freshman at Shahid Beheshti University in Iran several years ago, I had a cahnce to enroll in a chemistry class with a very bright profossor. Although I always hated chemistry, He managed to encourage me to do several experiment on acids and bases. I could not not reach high score in that course, but I had learned so much more from him, helping me to be a chemist. Had it not been for my chemistry professor, I would not have pursued chemistry.
Another point worth mentioning is that, for employers, the importance of good grades in school is substituted by practical knowledge. Nowadays, with increasing availabity of knowledge, mere and more people are able to get university degrees. as a result, companies are bombarded with huge number of university graduates looking for suitable jobs. It goes without saying that the neither private sector nor government can handle this much of people looking for job. Thus they make the application requirement harder and harder. On of way of this strict rule is requiring a hands on experience or portfolio consist of practical capabilities rather than grades.
To conclude, having considered all points discussed earlier, I firmly believe that a fun professor with strict grading policy is a beneficial choice. This is because not only it can keep student motivated, but also, nowadays, the grades is not of significant importance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 819, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: not
... experiment on acids and bases. I could not not reach high score in that course, but I ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 243, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...ple are able to get university degrees. as a result, companies are bombarded with ...
^^
Line 5, column 466, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...le this much of people looking for job. Thus they make the application requirement h...
^^^^
Line 5, column 571, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a hand' or simply 'hands'?
Suggestion: a hand; hands
...of way of this strict rule is requiring a hands on experience or portfolio consist of p...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, thus, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1957.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 386.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06994818653 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88933051501 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608808290155 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.9141629142 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1904761905 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.380952381 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 5.45110844103 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172709814613 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445378362794 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668043787327 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120378555079 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647638588467 0.0645574589148 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.