Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is important to have rules about the types of clothes that people wear in their workplace and at school.
Today's modern world places a grat deal of importance on preparing the right situation for maximizing the productivity of employers. With this in mind, people and their employers often debate whether the same clothing for everyone in workplace is important or not. Personally, I would prefer a strict rule for clothing in working environments for various reasons, two of which I shall touch upon in following paragraphs to prove my perspective.
To begin with, given the fact that coworkers coexist in same place for several hours a day, having a same look would decrease the strees and pressure on each of them helping to bond with each other easily. Nowadays, the majority of people are insecure about their look simply because they do not earn so much to spend a staggering amount of money on their look. With this in mind, a same uniform can solve this issue by giving them simply a common ground. Although there may be some occiasional brags or show-offs but they would be limited. Moreover, it can generate the feel of order and simplicty which is very benefical for a working environment and it can further increase the sense of comraderies. A recent study have published an exciting result. Conducted at the University of California, Berkely, California, this study suggest that anxiety attacks and peer pressure among coworker are reduced by 50 percent, when wearing an uniform is required. In light of this finding, order and decreased stress level can be accounted as a result of using uniforms.
Another point worth mentioning is that, having a same wearing everday prevents employees to save time, which can be used to improve productivity. In this day and age of modernization, there is constant hype for fashions. That said, individuals are always looking forward to new designs and fashion trends, consuming much of their time and energy. Workers are no expetions and they are a part of this society. Thus, with no need for shoping and being fashionable everyday, one could seize this golden opportunity to work for more hours, which increases one's earning and revenue. So this is a win-win scenario. My own experince illustrate this clearly. As an early employer at a tech-based firm, I used to dress selectively to impress my one coworker, and this imposed a strain on my budget. On day, the company anounce that they required a uniform. After that, I managed to save money and handle my budget more efficiently. In addition, giving the fact that I did not have to spend so much time on choosing clothes, I had more time working, which helped me to rise my income into a whole new level. In several years, I was able to buy my favorite car. Had it not been for that uniform, I would not been able to save money to buy my favorite car.
To conclude, having considered all points discussed previously, I firmly believe that having rules for workers' style is a beneficial move . This is because not only can it promote order and strenghten the bond between employees but it also saves time and can increase productivity and efficiency in company.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 932, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...are reduced by 50 percent, when wearing an uniform is required. In light of this f...
^^
Line 5, column 463, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... need for shoping and being fashionable everyday, one could seize this golden opportunit...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 553, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...to work for more hours, which increases ones earning and revenue. So this is a win-w...
^^^^
Line 7, column 138, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s for workers style is a beneficial move . This is because not only can it promote...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, moreover, so, thus, in addition, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2547.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 524.0 407.700716846 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8606870229 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7844588288 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68607630117 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 285.0 212.727598566 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543893129771 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 807.3 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8989020005 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9615384615 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1538461538 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.26923076923 5.45110844103 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137917853608 0.236089414692 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0343720905357 0.076458572812 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489568535239 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0945559909043 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486364035725 0.0645574589148 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 86.8835125448 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.