The uniform regulations have been debatable for a long time. Some people believe that workers or students should wear uniforms, while others argue against it. As for me, I agree that it is crucial to rule the uniform type for employees and students.
First of all, wearing the same type of uniform can shape a good image of a school or company, making them have a great reputation. For example, when I was studying at Song-Shan high school, all the students had to wear the same type of uniform based on the school’s policy. Once, an educational supervisor stopped by my school. He was impressed that all the students dressed in green uniforms and wore them tidily. Not until did he spread his extraordinary impression to other schools and the educational division of Taiwan, Song-Shan high school was entitled as "the best representative of the high school". Thus, the unifying uniform school policy really helped Song-Shan high school get a good reputation.
Secondly, regulating employees or students to dress in the same type of uniform can inspire their sense of belonging to the company. For instance, when I worked for TSMC, the TSMC uniforms always gave me a reminder that I worked for one of the biggest corporations in the world. Furthermore, it seemed like all the TSMC staff were a bid team or even a big family by wearing the same type of uniform. Even though we sometimes had distinctive opinions on work, we would try to care about others' feelings and collaborate with others on projects. Therefore, the uniforms allow us to understand that we were the members of the TSMC family.
On the contrary, it may cause a lot of trouble if there is no rule about the type of uniform. It is an example of my bizarre friend, Tom. Since Tom’s company did not regulate any type of uniform he should wear, he and his colleagues always wore tank tops, short pants, and flip-flops to work and meet their customers. However, these customers always felt disrespectful because of their clothes. They complained about their casual suits and even stopped collaboration with the company, causing a big loss in profits. With more and more cancellations of cases, the corporation eventually collapsed. Hence, the no-restricting uniform policy really made people careless about their working manners and led to a catastrophe for their company.
In conclusion, I hold the profound conviction that the rule of uniform wearing is important. After all, not only can the rules help a company or school to gain a good reputation but the rules can also inspire colleagues’ or students’ sense of belonging.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Once” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...f uniform based on the school’s policy. Once, an educational supervisor stopped by m...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, after all, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2183.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 439.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97266514806 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8130633624 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519362186788 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 673.2 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7907095577 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9130434783 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0869565217 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69565217391 5.45110844103 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214095447096 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065321357866 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414564560527 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122803853385 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349581035475 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.