Agree or disagree: students are more interested in politics than they were in the past.
Political participation has been acceptable for everyone for a long time. Some people think that students are more interested in politic nowadays, while other believe that students put less emphasis on it. As for me, I hold the belief that students are more interested in politics today that they were in the past.
First of all, it is easy for students to join the political demonstration parades today than in the past, thereby making students today have more interest in politics. For example, when I, a college student, want to show my perspective about the nuclear plant construction policy, I can easily find a parade to demonstrate my opinions. Besides, I also can hold the parade of anti-nuclear demonstration on the social media and websites. With the easy access of demonstration participation, I focus more political issue such as plastic usage, forest damage, and water pollution. On the contrary, since the special political issue between Taiwan and China, students in the 1960s were banned to join any parade, making them ignore and avoid to comment the political issue for a long time. Therefore, students nowadays really put more emphasis on politics than they do in the past.
Secondly, since the technology makes news about politics more accessible, it encourages more students’ awareness about politics. Take my parents and I for example, when my parents were studied in college in 1970, it was hard to access the news reported on the television. With this inconvenience, my mom and dad knew nothing about the government policies, making no student show political awareness and interest. In contrast, when I study in the university now, not only can I watch the news on the television but I can also watch the government policies on the website to supervise the government. By this technology revolution, all my classmates and friends showed their concerns about policies. Hence, the easy access to the news really allow students today to focus more on political issues.
Last but not least, since school nowadays set up the civics classes for students to discuss the political issues and learn the political concepts, it improves students’ intrigue to the politics. For instance, when the government deiced to set up the civics classes at school in 2000, all the students can learn the voting policies, laws, and other political knowledge. With this change, more and more students can share their opinions in class by presentation and discussion. Additionally, students could also utilize their civics knowledge to found out the bad policy and report it to the government, which the students before 2000 had no ability to do. Consequently, the civics education really allows more students nowadays to acquire their political knowledge to participate in politics.
In conclusion, I hold the profound conviction that students today are more intrigued in politics than they were in the past. After all, not only students can easily access to political demonstration and news to share their political views bur they also possess more political knowledge to aware their country’s politics.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, hence, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, after all, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2620.0 1977.66487455 132% => OK
No of words: 503.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20874751491 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83378246024 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.443339960239 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 825.3 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.51792114695 284% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9652135252 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.090909091 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8636363636 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 5.45110844103 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404709109414 0.236089414692 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155982216404 0.076458572812 204% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135059555721 0.0737576698707 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.290602652169 0.150856017488 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0968394520278 0.0645574589148 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.