do you agree or this agree with the following statement.
people are initially leader and do not need to learn to be a leader.
Whether excellent social skills can be trained trough educational programs or they are, basically, inborn abilities is one of the most controversial subjects, which often provoke discussions. Some people keep endorsing that people can be a successful leader even if they have never been thought leadership courses, whereas others dismiss this idea. Personally, I have a mixed opinion in this regard and believing that both inborn features and sufficient training in the related field are inevitable for individuals to become a prosperous leader. I will thoroughly elucidate what rational my perspective is based on In what fallows.
To begin with, leadership skills, like any other skills, requires specific basic personal characteristics. To delineate, a person should enrich its personality with positive personal features such self-confidence, the power of persuading people, time, financial and human resource managing ability and so on, in order to acquire the ability of heading and controlling. Needless to say that, all aforementioned abilities are mostly inborn and a part of one's firm character which hardly can be altered. There is a compelling example of this point. A few years ago, I had been working in a consulting company which was experiencing a tough financial problem. After spending a month working there, I get familiar with the chairman's personality, who was a very kind, however, week man without the sufficient ability of decision making. Although he had been educated in the field of MBA, but he could not personally control his emotions which affected his decision making and domination through his employees. Actually, his personal characteristic had adverse impacts on his leadership and imposed financial matters to not only our company and employers but also our counterparts in other companies.
On the other side, another worthwhile reason to be mentioned is that professional education in the field of leadership and management is a crucial factor in prosperity of leaders. Since all skills demands particular abilities and knowledge, higher education or even part-time courses are necessary to train these skills to them. Leaders, As a matter of fact, inquisitee proper training to be able to manage and implement their personal abilities in the right way which yields the best results. Moreover, they have to learn theoretical principals and acquire experience in the interactions occurring during their education. Take my own experience as an example. Last year, I was offered to manage an executive project. I need to learn some Project managing plans which proposed different types of time, money and human resource managing plans. Therefore, I took a PMBOK course and learnt other ways of managing this project which gave rise to sooner termination of the project, even utilizing fewer workers.
To put on a nutshell, I firmly believe that both learning personal features contributes a significant role in the success of leaders. This is because unchangeable and steady traits and disposition of individuals' should allow them to have some special abilities. Furthermore, leaders need necessary theoretical knowledge which is gained through education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...our counterparts in other companies. On the other side, another worthwhile re...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, while, as a matter of fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2707.0 1977.66487455 137% => OK
No of words: 495.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46868686869 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01912821693 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 288.0 212.727598566 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581818181818 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 850.5 618.680645161 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2533453312 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.695652174 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5217391304 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30434782609 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109942360637 0.236089414692 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0325643992084 0.076458572812 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379460508514 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0776328277295 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365681664235 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 10.9000537634 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 155.0 86.8835125448 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.