Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
From a general point of standpoint, modern civilization has always been curious to get acquaintance with the ancient ones' features which, occasionally, a blanket of secrecy is thrown on them. In this vein, the best means of knowing about each country's civilization is one of the controversial subjects often provokes many discussions. Some people keep endorsing the claim that museums play an important role in giving signal about countries whereas others dismiss this idea. It is my firm conviction that individuals can learn a lot about countries by means of museums. In what follows, I aptly elucidate on what rationale my perspective is based on.
To commerce, museums are rich and valuable treasures holding a myriad of information, tools, crafts and even descriptions about countries impressive features such as the culture, geography, policies, history and so on. To put in a vivid picture, the aforementioned aspects of a country are fundamental and determining elements of its civilization which form the overall character of a country. Therefore, acquiring a comprehensive knowledge of them lead to learn many things about countries. My own experience is a compelling example of this notion. When I traveled to the west of my country, I planned to visit the main museum of one of the cities. Although I had read many books and watching many documents about the culture of this area, not to mention visiting the site, however the ancient manuscripts, ethical cloths and old weapons, enriched with the audio and written descriptions, broaden my vision profoundly and helped me universally perceive the history and mindset of the local people. Had it not been due to that visit, I would have not comprehensively conceive the substantial reasons lies behind their culture.
The second pivotal reason that bears in mind is that the precious tools and the original crafts and tools in the museums gave us a tangible and firsthand understanding of the subjects which picture in books and documentary films cannot provide. In other words, the taken photographs and recorded material do not reveal delicate and elegant details of the objects. Obviously, our comprehension is imperfect unless we see the accurate features of them closely or even touch them. Let me provide my timid friend's experience to illustrate this. I used to talk about the historical monuments of my country, especially the great Takht-e-Jamshid, with him. I described how huge and vast was this palace, and moreover, showed him picture of it. Later, he had visited Louver Museum and had a close look the sector dedicated to remains of this palace placed there. In fact, he excitedly told me that he had not grasped how the columns were tall and elaborated until he watched them in the museum. If he had not visited these relics in the museum, he could not understand the accurate greatness and glory of Takht-e-Jamshid which ccntributes to the historical competent and power of my country, even though I showed him pertinent pictures.
To put in a nutshell, museums can play the role of a fruitful mean to learn about a country. This is because not only museums keep a host of comprehensive data regarding various aspects of countries, but also do they provide us with a tangible perception of the subjects.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, moreover, regarding, second, so, therefore, whereas, in fact, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2744.0 1977.66487455 139% => OK
No of words: 541.0 407.700716846 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07208872458 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82280071112 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97524818735 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 301.0 212.727598566 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556377079482 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 850.5 618.680645161 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.877655981 48.9658058833 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.304347826 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5217391304 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30434782609 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184951979857 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523773388157 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0345287677661 0.0737576698707 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120394652521 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211496085872 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 157.0 86.8835125448 181% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.