Do you agree or disagree: Company should pay for employees to get university degree?
Along with the revolution of industry and commerce, the supply of corresponding high-level employees is in greatly short with advanced technology and concepts popping up. However, education of mankind does not keep up with this circumstance. Immediately, to address this problem, some assert that company could afford employees a university degree. Personally I totally agree that.
For one thing, employees could benefit a lot from getting university degree for free. A survey conducted by China Academic Institution shows that last year high-school students who decided not to continue their schooling verge on 32% of all valid questionnaires due to their financial problems. Therefore, with tuition fee provided by corporations, they could get better educated making it possible for them to replenish this urgent vacancy for company as well as have a higher salary simultaneously. Take my friend Monica, a nineteen years old girl graduating from our local high school one year ago, as an example. Once leaving our school, she found a job in a local factory and performed well. Her boss thought that she is so young and talented that he would like to offer her an opportunity to go to university funded by the factory with a prerequisite that after Monica graduates from the university she should go back to his factory as a technician leading a group of workers to research how to update its technical process, making gigantic profits for the whole factory. Eventually, Monica accept his proposal overjoyed and now she often tell to me that she could not believe it was true. How fortunate she is!
For another thing, employees with high skills could impetus development of company. Obviously, if a company could acquire ample brains brilliant, it will definitely be more competitive than its competitors. It is reflected on marketing strategy, quality products, efficient productivity and so forth. Let’s think about how Apple could lead the cellphone market. Undoubtedly, Steve Jobs played a role of pilot that guided the whole corporation successfully with his knowledgeable and professional scholarship and broadened horizon, which can be attained from higher education such as university especially.
At last, a country claiming for improvement can not do without brainpower. More brainpower raised by company may not only cause an increasing employment rate but also a tremendous advancement at some fields, which may further boost national economy and then emerge as a powerful state. Elaborately, since China has implemented a strategy ,” developing the country through science and education”, the Gross Domestic Product rise by more than 6% steadily per year. Accordingly could company donate their efforts to allow people get university degree, a better life will come soon.
From what has been discussed above, I support that company ought to afford employees for university degree.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1146, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'tells'.
Suggestion: tells
...is proposal overjoyed and now she often tell to me that she could not believe it was...
^^^^
Line 7, column 338, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
..., since China has implemented a strategy ,' developing the country through sc...
^^
Line 7, column 474, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Accordingly,
...rise by more than 6% steadily per year. Accordingly could company donate their efforts to a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, well, another thing, such as, as well as, for another thing, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2469.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 457.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40262582057 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98196710332 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 290.0 212.727598566 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634573304158 0.524837075471 121% => OK
syllable_count: 765.0 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.3756921289 48.9658058833 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.571428571 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7619047619 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52380952381 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222561254517 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648292653401 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0766285423253 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126303854477 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412777029925 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 86.8835125448 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.