do you agree or disagree with the following question? in order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news sources.

Essay topics:

do you agree or disagree with the following question? in order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news sources.

Undoubtedly, being sure of gaining accurate inforimation is a challange for popele who are living in a society. Some people prefer to watch limited source of information, others do not satisfy with those and seek for variety of news cahnels. I strongly believe that a wise person must consider all source of news becuase of following reasons.
Some news chanel are baised and do not show true information. There are several reasons for doing that. In my country, a minority group of people have dedicated dictatorship in country over fourty years. They have coerced people to do what they want and show them what is necessary to keep the power. In this trend, people usually do not trust governmental chanels, which show the news. Consequently, they seek for foreign chanels to atain honest news.
Becides, by observing other sources of news people can broaden their horizon and knowledge bases. You can gather all the information about an incident and then make a solid interpretion from your data. For example, my father watchs all the chenels that are available for him and then makes a conclution of them. In this way, he can approach to a incident with many differnet angle.
Finally, Sometimes a chanel do not cover all the useful information about an incident interverabily. It is easy to make mistake in journalism commiunity. In some situations, human error can be considered as news cahnel fault and mislead viewers. For example, when one of the greatest building in my town got fired, only small group of journalist could cover the incident. Many of them could not reach the building in the right time. As a result, when the building collapsed, a few short footage were avalible to show in the news.
In conclution, it is crucial for every individual to observe a wide group of source of information to achieve the lattast news. In this way, the individual not only can interpret precisely, but also he can perfectly devide the baised information from true ones.

Votes
Average: 6.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...f them. In this way, he can approach to a incident with many differnet angle. Fi...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, if, so, then, for example, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 335.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90447761194 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70059356693 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558208955224 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.6804892544 48.9658058833 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.2380952381 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9523809524 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.45110844103 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177353684091 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526124749757 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370955066358 0.0737576698707 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0994026799389 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027267855734 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.