Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take basic science courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The efficiecy of student's learning is a vital factor in their school time, which affect all aspects of their life. What courses and who many credits students shuld take to take has a direct effect on their yield in college. While some believe that students should learn some basic science courses, others disagree. In my opinion, it is so important that students read just the relevant courses to their majors. In what follows, I delve into my reasons.
First, it will be a huge waste of time, money, and energy of student who study unrelevant courses to their majors. In this sophisticated world in which all career has become complicated, student should learn related lesson to their future career. When finding a job needs especiallity in that field, we can't expect that student should take some unrelated courses. To put this into perspective, a student who is studying history or philosophy not only may not interested to read biology or mathematics, but also he hates to pay tution fee for some thing that is not related to his major. When I was a student in Boston college three years ago, the university's adminstration announced that all students should take one course of math or physics. One of my friends challenged the faculties. In the specific debate about this challenge, the administrator did not present a reasonable reason for their proposal and no students accept to pay for unrelevant courses to their fields.
Second, it decrease the students efficiency and productivity through which the stidents' passion diminish to their majores. If the university oblige student to take some basic science course, thsoe students who are not interested will hurt. Since they are not eager to participate those classes, they participate reluctantly and won't pay enough attention to discussion. As a result, they won't take advantage from those classes. In contrast, if they choose courses that they have passion, they will bring their heart to work and passionately engage with calss which ends up making the best out of the classes. Consequently, they not only learn compeltly, but also thrive in those fields.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that this is not a good policy to require students to take some basics science courses. This will be a massive waste of resources for students, in addition they will lose the chance to take some specific courses that they are more enthosiastic about them rather than science courses.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 454, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... what follows, I delve into my reasons. First, it will be a huge waste of time, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ob needs especiallity in that field, we cant expect that student should take some un...
^^^^
Line 3, column 543, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'something'?
Suggestion: something
...but also he hates to pay tution fee for some thing that is not related to his major. When ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 977, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for unrelevant courses to their fields. Second, it decrease the students efficie...
^^^
Line 4, column 12, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'decreases'?
Suggestion: decreases
... courses to their fields. Second, it decrease the students efficiency and productivit...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 25, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...heir fields. Second, it decrease the students efficiency and productivity through whi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, second, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2040.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03703703704 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65877432904 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516049382716 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.621712485 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278438122136 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885712568878 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571794542274 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175136100808 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564818335789 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.