Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? all university student should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is
It is crystal clear that the educational systems in different countries have tried to highlight their own history for students. Many people hold the opinion that all students in universities should take courses in history, despite their different majors. I, personally speaking, agree with this opinion. The reasons to substantiate my view are elaborated upon in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, the history courses will improve the sense of responsibility in students who study in different majors. The student can study the occurrences in the past and learn about the people who put their families and dreams aside to improve their country. Moreover, the students can learn about the wars and the people who started them. Therefore, they can understand the value of humanity. For instance, I had history courses during my undergraduate program. Before I take the course, I tried to cheat in my other courses and my projects. When I took the history course, I study about a famous man named Dr. Mosadegh. He was a very famous man because Although he lost his son, he fought against England to Improve the Iranian industry. The people have recognized him as a legend in my country. After I studied about him, I understood that my country builds on such a class of thought. As a result, I changed and tried to be a real human. From that day, I have never cheated on anybody and helped the people around me.
Secondly, learning about a different aspect of life and people's decisions during centuries in history courses can open different students' minds. The students can study possible mistakes of people and learn to aid such similar situations. Moreover, These correct and incorrect decisions are somehow a bank of brainstorming. The students may consider the consequences of decisions and decide what to do in similar dilemmas. My own experience demonstrates this concept. When university unversity, I studied about industrial revolutions, and how the decrease and then increase in workers' salary can affect and improve the whole workers', and consequently, companies' efficiency. Five years later, I was hired by a company as a chief engineer. Once there was a dilemma in which my boss did not want to increase the wages. I spoke with him about historical concepts of the industrial revolution, and he agreed to decrease the salaries at first and increase them. Fortunately, the company efficiency increased, sales became double, and company financial position improved.
To conclude, considering mentioned reasons into account, I strongly agree that all the students in the university should take history courses. This is because history courses improve the sense of responsibility among students, and also studying history leads to open-minded students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1004, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding people'?
Suggestion: the surrounding people
...ave never cheated on anybody and helped the people around me. Secondly, learning about a different ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 737, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Once” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...hired by a company as a chief engineer. Once there was a dilemma in which my boss di...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for instance, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2321.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 447.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19239373602 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86913776485 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51677852349 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 728.1 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.3718900146 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.8928571429 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9642857143 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46428571429 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254898375503 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636332857515 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066675499063 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181242181371 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553149221712 0.0645574589148 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.