Courses, the founding stone of students' university life, have been valued and even trigger heated discussion over whether students should be required to attend history courses. History modules, in some people's views, are unessential for university students. Contrary to these people's views is my perspective that all of the university students should be required to take history courses due to the contribution on their academic learning and personal development.
What should be prioritized is that setting history courses to be complusory, compared with make it to be selective, can benefit students' academic life by facilitating getting a wide range of knowledge and stimulating their interests. To begin with, prioritizing history courses is conducive to provide students with a great deal of knowledge. To be specific, when getting immersed in learing historic events, such as the modern technology evolution, the World War Two, and the discovery of new continents, which helps us master details of such events, providing us with a great quantity of knowledge; on the contrary, such instructions from history could not be obtained by college students if they are not forced to take such history courses. Moreover, by scrutinizing relevant historic materials in the classes, students would gradually have interests in history. Specifically, when taking history classes, students may find that they have information gap in this subject matter, which will motivate them to investigate related materials to reduce this gap, stimulating their interests; in contrast, hardly can such motivation occur if students drop history courses freely.
What should be equally worth discussion is that being required to learning history, instead of dropping history courses, is also beneficial for students' development by enabling students to foster time managment skills and interpersonal skills. Firstly, by taking history courses, students can foster the quality of persistency. Being required to take history courses means that some students' workload is increased, stimulating them to better manage their time, such as prioritizing the core tasks, helping to establish their time management strategies; on the other hand, how can students develop time-managing skills if they have a few courses to take? What's more, taking history courses also help develop their interpersonal skills. In detail, students need to do group projects, such as doing a survey about a historic event, which force them to cooperate and communicate with others, sharpening their interpersonal skills; by contrast, such skills could hardly be gained if they can take the course freely.
To conclude, students should be required to take history courses owing to the benefits of their academic learning and personal development.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 314, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...se peoples views is my perspective that all of the university students should be required ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 384, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...to take history courses means that some students workload is increased, stimulating them...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 655, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...lls if they have a few courses to take? Whats more, taking history courses also help ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, so, in contrast, such as, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2379.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 424.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6108490566 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89481923746 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492924528302 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 725.4 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 99.1201342836 48.9658058833 202% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 169.928571429 100.406767564 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2857142857 20.6045352989 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 5.45110844103 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320291399933 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144523900526 0.076458572812 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597318667356 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236872459625 0.150856017488 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0165317463316 0.0645574589148 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.1 11.7677419355 171% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 58.1214874552 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.1575268817 159% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.85 10.9000537634 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 314, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...se peoples views is my perspective that all of the university students should be required ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 384, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...to take history courses means that some students workload is increased, stimulating them...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 655, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...lls if they have a few courses to take? Whats more, taking history courses also help ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, so, in contrast, such as, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2379.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 424.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6108490566 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89481923746 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492924528302 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 725.4 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 99.1201342836 48.9658058833 202% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 169.928571429 100.406767564 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2857142857 20.6045352989 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 5.45110844103 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320291399933 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144523900526 0.076458572812 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597318667356 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236872459625 0.150856017488 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0165317463316 0.0645574589148 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.1 11.7677419355 171% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 58.1214874552 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.1575268817 159% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.85 10.9000537634 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.