Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Although science and technology will continue to improve, the most significant improvement for the quality of people’s lives have already taken place.
By and large, technological advancement plays a crucial role in various aspects of people’">people’s life. there is a wide variety of debates on the fact that whether the quality of people’">people’s life has enhanced enough or not. I contend that there are a lot of unsolved problems which need considerable attention of technology and science. To support this, I will elaborate on in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, in today’s technological world, there are several unsolved issues in medical science which affect adversely on the individual’s lives. indeed, there are still plentiful diseases which are not curable such as Coronavirus, HIV, MS, and progressive cancer. so, people cannot be satisfied with the living standards until more researches are done to find novel approaches to deal with such conditions. For instance, my uncle who lived in Germany suffered from liver cancer. although he lived in the country which has great medical science and contemporary technology, scientists and doctors are not able to survive his life. Furthermore, his disease contributes to harmful side effects such as weight loss, hair loss, heart attack, and so on. Consequently, in spite of the scientific and technological developments people cannot be satisfied with the quality of life, and further research are required.
The second prominent factor is that there are many unsolved environment">environmental issues that have a negative impact on the quality of people’">people’s life. indeed, there is a considerable amount of damages in environments such as pollution and global warming. As a result, the environment is destroyed which threaten the mankind’s life, and scientist would try to find ideal approaches in order to overcome these problems and challenges. For example, burning fuels emit greenhouse gases and pollute the environment which imposes a threat on people’">people’s survival. so, scientists would like to see fossil fuels replaced by renewable energy source. By using renewable energy, the pollution is dramatically reduced. Moreover, air pollution is increased because of population growth and building more factories which threaten natural inhabitants. they need to explore many solutions through contemporary technology in order to save the environment. As a result, the quality of individual’s life is enhanced by scientific and technological developments and advancements.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that although we are living at the age of technology and science, there are still a lot of unsolved issues in society. Not only need a scientist to work on medical science, but they also work on environment">environmental problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...aspects of people’'>people’s life. there is a wide variety of debates on the fac...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Indeed
...ct adversely on the individual’s lives. indeed, there are still plentiful diseases whi...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...virus, HIV, MS, and progressive cancer. so, people cannot be satisfied with the li...
^^
Line 3, column 485, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
... in Germany suffered from liver cancer. although he lived in the country which has great...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 181, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Indeed
...lity of people’'>people’s life. indeed, there is a considerable amount of dama...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 602, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
... on people’'>people’s survival. so, scientists would like to see fossil fu...
^^
Line 5, column 881, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...ies which threaten natural inhabitants. they need to explore many solutions through ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, still, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, by and large, in spite of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2344.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 407.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75921375921 4.8611393121 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.27789882471 2.67179642975 160% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525798525799 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 723.6 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8242565519 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.545454545 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.95454545455 5.45110844103 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.85842293907 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16556981354 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049147133297 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410158001144 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102759955886 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378985000934 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 58.1214874552 62% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 10.9000537634 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.