Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

From the past times till now, communications and relations has been as the main issue of the human and made the societies. Most experts believe that the ability to speak is the most important attitude of human, which makes a difference between this creature and other species. So, this matter is not the whole story, and sometimes talking would become as a reason for causing fights and murder between people. Some people believe that to prevent happening bad events, it is better to not tell the truth sometimes. However, some others claim that people always must tell the right words. This issue has been a controversial subjects during the history. In my opinion, telling the truth will not be always a suitable action and sometimes it is better to get rid of that. In this article, I will present my main two reasons.

The first reason for supporting this issue is the thing that I mentioned in the first paragraph. Sometimes telling a little sentence, whether it is true or not, might cause a big disputation and a severe fight, which most of the time lead to a wound or even a murder. So, telling some opposite words might prevent this matter and maybe can save the humanity. For instance, the history experts believe that the World War II was started by just a word, which could not be told. This word was about the Nazi party and established the war.

Secondly, I believe that most people do not have the opportunity of hearing true statements. They just want to hear something they like and satisfies them. This matter becomes important when we encounter with a powerful person, for example a politician. During the history, there were several politicians who have been known as dictators. They only wanted to hear to some positive sentences about themselves and their country. Although this issue was the main reason of their subversion, there were no other way to speak with them and they used to kill anyone who told them the truth. This matter is also common in general people. They avoid of listening to the true speech about their condition. For example, my father suffers from severe depression, but he declines going to psychologist and implies that he doesn't want to hear his words about him.

In conclusion, although telling lies has become very common in our community, and it is better to avoid them, telling each true sentence would not be an appropriate action. I think saving relations and communications is more important than telling the truth. But remind that, we have to try right words until we can, and when we realize that this issue might threaten a person or a relation, we have to make a decision of telling lie.

Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:


Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 624, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'subject'?
Suggestion: subject
...ds. This issue has been a controversial subjects during the history. In my opinion, tell...
Line 5, column 811, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't to psychologist and implies that he doesnt want to hear his words about him. I...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in general, in my opinion, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2197.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 461.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76572668113 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48453510272 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501084598698 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3123695546 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.88 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.44 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15014925103 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431745932525 0.076458572812 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451350300934 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0908474070835 0.150856017488 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345499729378 0.0645574589148 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.