As time passes and human beings become more developed, people become more acquainted with the importance and characteristics of a leader. Schools, universities and academic clubs are trying to rear juveniles for the future generation. Nowadays, it is proved that undoubtedly, each prosperous’ society once have had a top-notch chief that has built the infrastructures. It is opined by some that a good boss should focus more time on his/her ideas while this essay is trying to refute this notion. Throughout the following paragraphs, among the most predominant reasons in support of this contention higher efficiency and broadening the horizons will be meticulously scrutinized to advocate this standpoint that an eminent head should be a good listener.
To commence with, it is obvious that each leader will be assessed by its achievements. Pioneers scramble to amend the current position in favor of a better future. When a boss materializes its staff’s needs, it helps them to be mentally satisfied and then consequently, they work harder, and more efficiently. A vivid example can be given to shed light on what has elaborated above. Here, I elucidate one of my own experiences. About four years ago, when I was working at RIS Lab., most of the employees suffered from the solid ambiance and air there and workforces didn’t have rest intervals. In primary stages, workers decorated their surroundings with vases and happy colors but it didn't occur any significant output. Finally, crews decided to negotiate with their boss upon this matter to permit them to have some short recovery intervals. Not only did it have impacts on their creativity and efficiency, but also it aided them to be closer and feel that they are a family.
Furthermore, listening to others’ opinions not only helps them to become informed about other possible solutions and viewpoints but also diminishes the risk of mistakes. In most of the hectic situations, regarding the experience of stress and pressure, people may make the wrong decision and inevitably, leaders are not the exception of this fact. To more clarify the condition, I mention the outcome of one fieldwork conducted at AUT School to probe the role of an empathetic boss, who listens and pays attention to staff’s requirements, on companies’ advancement. About 80 employees into two separate groups, one of them had permission to participate in meetings monthly and the other has no right, studied for five months. Amazingly, the results showed that the chief who consulted with employees has gained more favorable outcomes than and the error rate has decreased to less than 2%. Accordingly, listening to others’ notions broad your horizons and minimizes the error rate.
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that listening is counted as a secret weapon for good leaders and as different people have distinct thinking caps, it boosts leaders’ thoughts and as a result improves productivity and helps them to have a decisive verdict in dilemmas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 685, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ings with vases and happy colors but it didnt occur any significant output. Finally, ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 983, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... horizons and minimizes the error rate. To recapitulate, I pen down saying that ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, finally, furthermore, if, may, regarding, so, then, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2524.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 485.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20412371134 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69283662038 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95600935129 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 284.0 212.727598566 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585567010309 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 779.4 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5398340506 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.19047619 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0952380952 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212483002054 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519596865875 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563286850737 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119696140079 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540487614703 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 152.0 86.8835125448 175% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.