Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Governments should make it possible for all children to attend preschool (early childhood education programs, for example for three-year-old children) at no cost to the children's families.
Education is the founding stone of national prosperity. Early education is a part of it and should not be an exception. From my perspective, governments should provide free preschool programs.
First, allowing children to attend preschool ensures social fairness. As living expenses soared in recent decades, having both parents working are becoming increasingly common, especially in families without a robust financial foundation. The result is that there will be no one at home accompanying young children. Children staying at home alone is unsafe because they risk hurting themselves in ways they might be unaware of. In some countries, leaving children unattended at home can even be illegal. If tuition for early childhood education programs is costly or unaffordable for some families, they might need to have one parent quit the job to stay home looking after their children. And these families that cannot afford such tuitions are most likely the ones already struck by poverty. Losing one source of income might devastate their lives, making them even more likely to remain poverty-stricken. One way to address this issue is for governments to offer free preschool education to all families so that both parents would have time to do things more meaningful to their families. These include supporting the family financially and leaving young children to be catered to and educated by professional preschool educators. By doing so, families from different social classes would have equal opportunities in this kind of education, making it socially fair.
Second, it is a government obligation to improve the well-being of everyone through appropriate means. Most preschool programs teach pragmatic abilities, such as reading skills, without which many students would find it hard to effectively grasp precise ideas behind key concepts when most courses are getting more abstruse in higher grades. With more children attending these programs, future generations will have improved academic achievement, contributing to increased labor force productivity. Consequently, when these children grow up and start their careers, they can promote national economic growth, improving the lives of everyone. These prospects, which make people’s living standards higher, are the aims of a responsible government. Therefore, the government has the incentives to pay for such educational programs. Also, government expenditure comes primarily from tax revenues collected from taxpayers. These people are representatives of all its citizens, meaning everyone directly or indirectly made financial contributions to make a country’s fiscal policy possible. Hence, directing the money to areas that can make their lives better, such as paying for preschool programs, is a government responsibility.
To conclude, offering free preschool programs ensures social equality and is the duty of a responsible government.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, look, second, so, therefore, well, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2483.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 436.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69495412844 4.8611393121 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0079319921 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589449541284 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 765.0 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3480176891 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.458333333 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1666666667 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.91666666667 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310007193745 0.236089414692 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083980794293 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623371370803 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155691096975 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0856359619675 0.0645574589148 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 58.1214874552 62% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 10.9000537634 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 86.8835125448 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.