Some people think classic movies or tv shows have greater value, while others think new movies are more enjoyable.
Which one do you agree? And why?
In the wake of urbanization, most people live in cities today. With more people comes fiercer competition, which means most people would now face increasing pressure, making entertainment an inseparable part of modern life. Although many people prefer watching newer movies, I believe classic ones are more valuable for the following reasons.
First, classic movies or television shows have endured picky selection over time. Many new movies and television programs enter the entertainment market each year, but only a few will be around decades later. And this is because the producers sometimes do not even know how well the audience will appreciate their works, thus producing many unpopular ones. So, watching newer movies will inevitably increase the chance of encountering poorly made ones, wasting precious time needed for recreation. However, the experience of watching classic movies is different. Critics and commentators will closely examine newly released movies to make comparisons to find out the well-made ones. Even if their preferences represent their personal opinions, meaning their choices might not align with everyone else, their comments will still serve as a rough guideline for people to decide if those movies are worth watching. The reason is that when so many individuals share their feedback, their collective judgments are more likely to be objective, filtering out the uninteresting ones. And this means that watching a classic movie will likely be enjoyable since many other people have tried them out already.
Second, the entertainment industry today is profit-driven. To be more precise, movie directors care more about how much money they can make than how well-received their movies are. The result is that they will pay stronger emphasis on making the highest profit in ways that might deem inappropriate by their predecessors. For example, many movies now star celebrities primarily based on their popularity instead of their acting skills, which was unheard of in the past. Consequently, no matter how well-written the scripts are, these actors may make awkward conversations with unnatural facial expressions or stiff body language, ruining the movies. However, their fans would still be eager to buy tickets to watch those movies to see their idols in action and show their support. These movies are like bad coins, driving out the good ones, making it hard to find decently produced movies with professional acting and plots. Even when some movie producers treat their professions seriously and have produced good-quality works, they might lack funding for propaganda, which means not many people would know about them. Therefore, the majority of movies today will still be unentertaining.
To conclude, movies in the past are more valuable because they are enduring, and new movies are generally unentertaining because of their inferior quality.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, may, second, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2450.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 449.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4565701559 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75019338825 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572383073497 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 753.3 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.770988275 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.363636364 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4090909091 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.40909090909 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221984322022 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776083424739 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545764420767 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150707863494 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0142854326194 0.0645574589148 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.