Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
All scientific discoveries should be shared among scientists all around the world; governments and businesses should not keep any discoveries secret.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Science is one of the most critical driving forces that promotes human welfare and social advancement. Many would argue that scientific discoveries should be available to all scientists. However, from my perspective, not publicly sharing them is more beneficial.
First, financial incentives keep the field of science advancing fast. A common practice about scientific discoveries today is that if someone discovers something and has the findings patented, legal regulations will protect this discovery from being exploited by other parties, especially potential business competitors, for a certain amount of time. This protection allows the inventors to either receive a sizable license fee by authorizing others the right to use their inventions or commercialize their ideas themselves. For example, Thomas Edison was made wealthy for his discoveries in practical applications of electricity. Role models like him continually encourage people to devote their lives to scientific research for the love of science and the hope of being financially awarded. However, requiring all scientific discoveries to be publicized to other scientists means using others' findings might be free of charge. As a result, fewer people will invest time-consuming and laborious efforts in research since others will use their discoveries for free. This weakened financial incentive will result in slower scientific progress, eventually making everyone worse off.
Second, keeping some sensitive discoveries confidential can avoid potential misuse. Although most scientific findings make lives easier, some can be detrimental if not used under proper guidance. For instance, only a limited number of countries now possess the ability to build hydrogen bombs, but no one condemns them as being selfish. The reason is that secrets like this can be used for mass destruction and will bring catastrophic consequences when terrorists acknowledge the technology behind this weaponry. Similarly, some biochemical reactions can make producing drugs possible even in small workshops, meaning homemade drugs will flood the world when drug dealers learn the production process. Applying scientific discoveries for these wrongful intents will yield devastating results that no sane people wish to see. In other words, not only should governments not share this information with random people, but they had better implement laws or regulations to eliminate the possibility that potentially destructive scientific findings will end up in the wrong hands.
To conclude, not unselectively sharing scientific discoveries brings financial incentives and avoids misuse.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 866, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'scientists'' or 'scientist's'?
Suggestion: scientists'; scientist's
...c discoveries to be publicized to other scientists means using others findings might be fr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, similarly, so, for example, for instance, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2256.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.85974025974 4.8611393121 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9937969265 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625974025974 0.524837075471 119% => OK
syllable_count: 686.7 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2346292278 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.736842105 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2631578947 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221328441995 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718005993065 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648825649418 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141351319803 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0153385921931 0.0645574589148 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 58.1214874552 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.1575268817 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 10.9000537634 153% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.01818996416 124% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 86.8835125448 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.