Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In modem times, parents learn more from their children than children learn from their parents.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In the wake of modernization, society has become ever-more complex, bringing many changes to people’s daily lives. From my perspective, parents today learn more from their children than children from their parents.
First, the complexity of modern life makes children more likely to be well-suited to it than their parents. Empirical evidence suggests that people will become less able to adapt to social changes as they age. On the other hand, almost every day, children expose themselves to outside stimuli and accept new ways of life. For example, most young people today embrace the convenience of electronic payments. It is not rare to see young people using smartphones to buy subway tickets or pay for groceries in corner stores. However, for their parent generation, it can be difficult to fathom the charm of electronic money, especially when they often find it hard to use different smartphone applications. So, in many homes, children are the ones who lecture their parents on how to use electronic money with smartphones, guiding them through the seemingly puzzling user interfaces of cellphone applications. And this is only one facet showing how children are more sophisticated in adapting to emerging lifestyles. In other scenarios, such as going to theme parks or playing video games, which their parents are not so familiar with, children tend to share their experiences with their parents too.
Second, children can have wide-ranging perspectives compared to their parents. Most parents are full-time employees with relatively stable incomes to support their families. For this stability to last, their employments need to be long-lasting, which means they tend to work for the same company in the same industry for many years. The result is that they will likely narrow their perspectives since their colleges and clients are from similar walks of life. The news they hear and the information they process may largely confine to what is related to their field of expertise. Therefore, when they communicate with one another, their opinions are likely to be uniform, making them less likely to be aware of the feeling and thoughts of people with different social backgrounds. The situation is different for their children. Their classmates at grade schools, middle schools, and colleges will come from families from all walks of life. During every schoolday, these young children can share their experiences, preferences, opinions, and even cultural traditions with other children, making every child a little expert in the diversity of human thoughts. When these children go home, they can share stories and perspectives that their parents will never be able to encounter in their social circles.
To conclude, parents learn from their children more in life experiences and knowledge about different perspectives.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2397.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 447.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36241610738 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75618662636 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525727069351 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 722.7 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.419917736 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.954545455 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3181818182 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22727272727 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379559241945 0.236089414692 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128973830229 0.076458572812 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116560377001 0.0737576698707 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304870761746 0.150856017488 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575734831237 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.