Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
You should always state your honest opinion even when you know that most other people disagree with your point of view.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In the wake of modernization, many people now live closely together in big cities, making it even more necessary for people to socialize with others. From my perspective, consistently expressing one’s honest opinions brings social benefits, even though sometimes others might disagree with these opinions.
First, being honest when communicating with people can show that one is trustworthy. Everyone is different, meaning disagreements among people are inevitable during social interactions. Therefore, many fear the consequences of expressing different views - it may cause conflict or create tension during conversations. As a result, they may conceal their true feelings to show that their opinions align with everyone else. Most of the time, this approach will not be problematic. But if this happens frequently, others will eventually discover their insincerity, undermining their trust. A relatively rational choice is to tell other people one’s true thoughts regardless of whether these views will conflict with other people or not. The reason is that most people would understand that different people think differently. Hence, they would accept the differences. And when they realize that one always communicates honest opinions, they will be more likely to trust this person, resulting in potential benefits. For example, when employers find that their employees always speak boldly without worrying about offending them, they would value these employees more because they are capable of thinking independently. Since independent minds will likely possess individual initiative, boosting their problem-solving skills, they will be entrusted with valuable and critical tasks, helping with their career developments.
Second, telling others one’s true feelings strengthens relationships. The point of interacting with others is to exchange ideas. So, if for whatever concerns one cannot express one’s genuine thoughts, others will not be able to know what one thinks. Serious conversations in which one can communicate profound ideas with others are rare, so if one forfeits the chances of letting others know about them better, their mutual understandings will remain superficial, contributing little to improving interpersonal relationships. Moreover, people are more likely to have serious conversations when holding conflicting views. And this is because they will have different perspectives regarding the same issue. When they can exchange their ideas sincerely, each will have the chance to know about the facets they might have overlooked. For instance, when two persons talk about reducing carbon emissions, one argues that all nations must share this responsibility evenly because environmental conditions affect everyone. At the same time, the other person believes wealthier nations need to contribute more, given that people from less developed countries face even worse problems, such as famine or not having access to clean drinking water. When knowing the genuine views of each other, the two can have a more comprehensive understanding of the issues discussed. And this mutual gain in cognition will help them appreciate one another more, enhancing their relationships.
To conclude, honestly expressing opinions will win the trust of others and strengthen interpersonal relationships.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun fear seems to be countable; consider using: 'many fears'.
Suggestion: many fears
... during social interactions. Therefore, many fear the consequences of expressing differen...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, honestly, if, look, may, moreover, regarding, second, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 26.0 9.8082437276 265% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2841.0 1977.66487455 144% => OK
No of words: 487.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.83367556468 4.8611393121 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69766713281 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00236108714 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552361396304 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 847.8 618.680645161 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2424564602 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.269230769 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7307692308 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42307692308 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161622428607 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553650588879 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426747799354 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114548300485 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339353545659 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 10.9000537634 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 86.8835125448 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.