Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Human activity is making the earth a worse place to live. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
human activity influences the earth, and the world is changing due to the activities of humans. In my opinion, the earth is damaged by human activity.
At first, human activity pollutes the earth, for centuries, humans have tried to take the profit out from nature by extracting natural gases, petroleum, and mining to improve the industries that caused air pollution, which had a terrible effect on our health. Additionally, the diseases raised, such as chronic lung diseases. Another problem is "the green-house effect." human activity decreases forests and increases the usage of fuels so that the gas of carbon dioxide is output more and more, and there are not enough plants to absorb it. The green-house effect is more sensible these years because it led to global warming. due to this effect, icebergs in the south polar and north polar melt, and the sea level becomes higher than before.
Moreover, human activity has damaged the natural environment and almost exhausted natural resources. Modern industry needs more and more resources, including minerals, fuels, and water, so we face serious problems such as lack of water, also the ecological balance is damaged because factories occupied many places where animals and plants live, as a result, many animals habitat are damaged
In the end, I believe that human activity has made the planet a less pleasant place to live because people are more likely to suffer from the effects of pollution than in the past, and because of destroying forest and animal habitats.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Human
human activity influences the earth, and the ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... earth is damaged by human activity. At first, human activity pollutes the ea...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 644, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Due
...years because it led to global warming. due to this effect, icebergs in the south p...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ea level becomes higher than before. Moreover, human activity has damaged the...
^^
Line 5, column 367, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...mals and plants live, as a result, many animals habitat are damaged In the e...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 394, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...result, many animals habitat are damaged In the end, I believe that human ac...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, moreover, so, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 9.8082437276 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 43.0788530466 26% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 52.1666666667 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 1977.66487455 65% => OK
No of words: 250.0 407.700716846 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.176 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.48103885553 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54393710614 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.624 0.524837075471 119% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 618.680645161 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.6003584229 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 145.356352238 48.9658058833 297% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 143.777777778 100.406767564 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7777777778 20.6045352989 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 11.8709677419 17% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128573347235 0.236089414692 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587422407592 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514741389177 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0978919202619 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475609514185 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 11.7677419355 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 58.1214874552 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.