By and large, it is established beyond doubt that education has been one of the important aspects of every society. In this regard, improving the quality of education is of paramount importance. There has been no shortage of debates among scholars on whether it is more beneficial to spend more money on salaries for professors or invest money in other areas. As for this writer’s opinion, I will subscribe to the latter idea. In what follows, I will elaborate on the most crucial reasons to substantiate my perspective.
The first reason is that equipment is more necessary for the quality of education. It is crystal clear that students often learn academic courses without practical examinations. They need to see the results of academic knowledge in equipped laboratories. By way of illustration, when I was a computer science student at the university, the professor learned us how to program with C language by showing lectures. unfortunately, the university did not provide a computer lab for us due to the lack of money. At the end of the semester, we learned the syntaxes and passed the exam but we could not program with computers in the real world. The more practical works students do at the university, the more successful person they will be in the future. Had the university not invested money in professors’ salaries it would have provided us a computer lab for students in order to improve the quality of education. This example clearly illustrates that the investment in salary for professors may interfere with the quality of education.
Furthermore, a high salary may have bad effects on professors. It is noteworthy that some professors who receive a high salary do not teach very well because they are convenient for their salaries. As a case in point, I had a mathematics professor who was very famous for his researches and papers. He took a high salary from the university for teaching us; but not only could he not teach us very well but also he did not answer students’ questions. He just thought for money and he did not care about the students’ education. As a result, I have a lot of troubles with math and I failed the math exam. Although he received a high salary all students were dissatisfaction about his teaching. This example clears that high salary always does not result in the high quality of education.
To put it briefly, as I mentioned above, one can infer that spending more salaries for professors may interfere with the quality of education. There is a couple of points which are worth to restating: firstly, the university can provide equipment for students instead of invest in salary for professors; secondly, high salary may cause professors do not perform their tasks perfectly. As this writer’s advice, I highly urge universities to invest their money in other crucial areas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 413, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Unfortunately
...am with C language by showing lectures. unfortunately, the university did not provide a compu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 614, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s with math and I failed the math exam. Although he received a high salary all students ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, first, firstly, furthermore, may, second, secondly, so, well, as for, as a result, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2379.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 479.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96659707724 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67825486995 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99296234188 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46764091858 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 766.8 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0539635991 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.16 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.16 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288498645518 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0862804928355 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683534813976 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189419901569 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422338411683 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.