By and large, it is established beyond doubt that people have been dealing with a lot of drawbacks in this sophisticated era. In this regard, the governments try to make this era a better place to live by investment in different areas. A hot debate raises here that the governments should spend money to improve Internet access or they should care more about improving public transportation. As for this writer’s opinion, I subscribe to the latter idea. In what follows, I will elaborate on the most outstanding reasons.
The first reason is that public transportation would diminish the air pollution. It is crystal clear that air pollution is one of the most crucial elements in every society and everyone aims to contribute to finding a solution to this problem. It goes without saying that the more public transportation people use for reaching their destinations, the fewer fossil fuels personal cars would release into the air. By way of illustration, one of my friends has lived in a city in London where there is a modern and expand public transportation exists and most people use it instead of their personal cars for their daily works; as a result, the weather is pure and clean there and a few people suffer from diseases are caused by low air quality. However, I live in Tehran, capital of Iran, where most people prefer their personal cars to public transportations and suffer from air pollution every session of the year. Had I lived in that city in London I would not have suffered from lung’s problem. As this example illustrates, improving public transportation would benefits people more than advancement in another era.
Furthermore, improving public transportation make the access of people easy, especially tourists. In other words, advance public transportation increases the prestige of the society. It is noteworthy that when people travel to a new country, it is important for them to feel convenient in that place and everything is readily accessible to them. Not only does advanced public transportation convenience tourists but also it would bring a lot of benefits to the government, in turn. As a way of illustration, I have traveled to that city in London my friend lives there, and I could visit all places and restaurants by advance buses which were created by the government for tourists and all people use these buses instead of hiring low price cars. As a result, I really fell in love with that city and I could flow some money in that city by paying bus tickets. This example clears how much important public transportation can be for a society.
To put it briefly, as I mentioned above, one can infer that investment in public transportation is vital for people’s lives and brings a lot of prestige in the tourists’ eyes when they travel there for the first time and brings back money to the government. As for this writer’s advice, I highly urge governments to invest more and more in public transportation and encourage people to use them instead o their personal cars.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1070, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'benefit'
Suggestion: benefit
..., improving public transportation would benefits people more than advancement in another...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, first, furthermore, however, if, really, so, as for, as a result, by and large, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 8.0752688172 322% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2535.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 511.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96086105675 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75450408675 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99510235773 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457925636008 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 786.6 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.8044980864 48.9658058833 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.714285714 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231646967084 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813125724602 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0910994229074 0.0737576698707 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158458526465 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471776708788 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.