Do you agree or disagree with the statement that governments should spend more money to improve internet access not on public transportation?
Safe and secure communication is one the most of all essential and basic rights of individuals. Government must provide such services accessible to even the most remotes parts of the country. Advantages of improvement in public transportation out weights any benefits provided by internet availability. I strongly disagree with the claim that public assets should be allocated to internet services rather than public transportation systems
Most citizens spend nearly quarter of their daily time on the road in order to reach their working destinations. More relaxed and calm the environment of transportation devices are, better the result of consecutive working hours will be. When people get the chance to take clean and calm subways, buses, local trains or any other high tech vehicles, they will be motivated to coordinate their collective efforts into society goals and put their utmost efforts to achieve this aim.
The strength of public transportation is considered as one of the major attraction of the cities and country. Many tourisms choose their holiday destination based on the availability and comfort of public transportation. Needless to say how important is the tourism industry in our modern world to all communications in both economic and social view. Better public transportation system will ensure a high amount of income during peak holiday times or other travel dates which will assist government to go throughout their budget.
The quality of public transport affects the quality of weather, in this way, people lead happier life and maintain in good health. Such policies will make dramatic reduction in the amount of money necessary for public medical system and will save country billions of dollars. For example, when the cycling roads are well organized in the cities, there will be more people at any age, interested in using them which will result in overall fitness, less air pollutions and therefore better life styles. All these can be accomplished only if the government spend more budgets on cycling facilities.
In conclusion, I think when it comes to whether spend money on public transportation system or internet services, public transportation should certainly win. Correct allocations of all public taxes and other governmental revenues, will help country develop faster and better over time.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, well, for example, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1981.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 367.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39782016349 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91034196553 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588555858311 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3543304369 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.8125 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9375 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254372001922 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845104613019 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789634325139 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148426213957 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0825757033658 0.0645574589148 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.