Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

In the modern era, education is regarded as one of the crucial factors contributing to the success rate of individuals and society. One of the heated debates in this realm is associated with the areas that the university's budget should be spent on. Many people adhere to the view that this money should be given to the professors to increase the teaching quality, while others believe it should be allocated to the development of the infrastructure of the university. I firmly disagree with the proposed statement, and I believe investing in other areas could be more effective than raising the staff's wages. In what follows, I will cogently pinpoint my most conspicuous reasons to justify my point of view.

The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that one of the biggest problems of the education system is poor schedule flexibility for students. Many courses are presented by only one professor, so students do not have adequate options for their upcoming semester. Moreover, plenty of classes become full, therefore the students are obligated to postpone their studies to other sessions. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. Two years ago, I was going to get a job that required my presence for three full days a week. However, one of my courses was my only class on Sundays, but it was in the middle of the day. Since going to the class from work then returning to it was not an affordable option, I dropped the job position while I seriously needed the money. Thus, I suppose if we had more instructors, I could come up with a convenient study plan to keep the job alongside my required courses.

Another equally significant point to be mentioned is that the budget can be used to upgrade the laboratory facilities. The practical part of our studies happens in laboratories where we learn how to use our knowledge in the actual cases. Not having proper tools can harm this process because the fluctuation in old devices distracts students from the main objectives of the course. To put it in a more vivid picture, during the last term, I attended the microprocessor laboratory which is one of my most essential lessons to take. However, we could not finish most of our experiments on time due to the flaws in the old processors. In most of my experiments, I did not get the correct results because of these obstacles, so I had to stay extra hours to debug my circuits. As a result, not only I did not learn anything from this course, but also I got an awful grade which reduced my total GPA.

In brief, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that there are plenty of areas at universities that desperately need a budget. For instance, increasing the number of professors and upgrading laboratories can affect the increase of education standards more than rising professors' salaries.

Average: 4.2 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for instance, i suppose, in brief, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2362.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 487.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8501026694 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69766713281 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85064851066 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533880903491 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 756.0 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1364963501 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.363636364 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1363636364 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0779941971427 0.236089414692 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0230307033897 0.076458572812 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0309362000307 0.0737576698707 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0499853723239 0.150856017488 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407399188038 0.0645574589148 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 86.8835125448 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.