This article suggests that tax on cigars and unhealthy food is beneficial for society and provides three reasons for support. However, the professor believes that each of the reasons can be challenged. Then, she denies each of the author's points.
First, the reading claims that it would discourage people from continuing this behavior, so the society is going to be healthier. The professor refutes this point by saying that in this approach, people have to buy products with lower qualities which are even more harmful to their health and bring more significant risks.
Secondly, the article posits that it is fair to invest extra money taken from people on their health services to cover their medical expenses. However, the professor says that although it might seem fair at first, it is in fact, unfair. This is because it is a more significant burden for people with low incomes, while it does not affect people with high salaries.
Third, the reading states that the tax can be used on different things like governmental projects that are beneficial for the public. The professor opposes this point by explaining the downside of this approach. She states that It causes the government to rely on this money so that it stops its influential activities toward limiting such behavior. For example, the law that restricts people from smoking in public might be eliminated to increase the government's profit.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, third, while, for example, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1189.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 233.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10300429185 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53522041558 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557939914163 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 344.7 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0974692159 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0833333333 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4166666667 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.06452816374 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116028914715 0.272083759551 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0418873683223 0.0996497079465 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488121349865 0.0662205650399 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0733500797035 0.162205337803 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336197769155 0.0443174109184 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.