Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
In this era of technology and communication, achieving higher degrees of studies and getting well-educated has a crucial role on every individual's life. This way, many people believe that to perform better results, universities have to increase salaries for the academic staff of the university. However, in my point of view, this does not have an essential impact on the quality of the educational system. In the following essay, I talk about some specific reasons for this idea.
First of all, no matter how much money professors are paid, they are responsible for whatever they are teaching and tutoring at universities. Roughly speaking, when someone is being employed by an academy, they accept that they have to teach courses in the best way possible, engage with students, and help them find their own way in academia. So, although increasing salaries may encourage lecturers and teachers to dedicate more time to their job, it has no direct effects on the quality of lectures.
Secondly, it is obvious that the only factor affecting the education quality is not the professors attending there. Undoubtedly, to make major progress on the efficiency of studies, universities have to care about different aspects of learning. To illustrate, imagine that you want to learn about different sounds that musical instruments can make. To learn the topic properly, it is not enough to join a high-level abstract course taught by a well-known professor at the best university over the globe. You need to have the chance to make some real experiments by playing various instruments, access the best books and sources about the topic, and many other things. So, just paying more salaries to teachers, cannot cover all the dimensions of perfect learning by students.
Finally, yet importantly, universities, colleges, and all other academic places over the world have some limited sources of budget and there are not always investors and philanthropists who are willing to donate a great deal of money to help universities offer better facilities. Therefore, these academic places have to divide their budget in a rational way to cover all needs of students and mitigate the situation for better results and performances.
To sum it up, I believe that spending more money on professors' salaries cannot result in better educational results because this doesn't have anything to do with the quality of teaching and also, other elements such as libraries, laboratories, seminars, and conferences can affect the quality of studies even more and universities have a limited budget for all the mentioned facilities. So, instead of increasing the payments, they'd better invest money on side activities and get benefits from inviting guest professors for seminars, short courses, and conferences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ll-educated has a crucial role on every individuals life. This way, many people believe tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 342, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a rational way" with adverb for "rational"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...emic places have to divide their budget in a rational way to cover all needs of students and miti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 130, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...better educational results because this doesnt have anything to do with the quality of...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 427, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they'd
...So, instead of increasing the payments, theyd better invest money on side activities ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2350.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 445.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2808988764 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89218284796 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54606741573 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 742.5 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.4679011841 48.9658058833 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.235294118 100.406767564 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1764705882 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266947598443 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780009774378 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599850222106 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142215020074 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722850748905 0.0645574589148 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 11.7677419355 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 58.1214874552 63% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.