University professors play significant roles in universities thus, they should be admired and considered as momentous members. Universities try to enhance the quality of education by several methods; one of these methods is increasing the professor’s salary. Some people agree with spending money on salaries, but others disagree and recommend other ways as improving the quality of education. As far as I am concerned, I disagree with improving salaries because of education quality enhancement. I, personally, suggest that by monitoring and tracking professor’s lectures, and giving scores to professors associated with student’s opinions, can make the quality of education better.
First of all, the quality of professor’s courses could improve education in universities. The professors should present the lectures as well as they can, in addition, their exams must be correctly evaluated the student’s knowledge. So, the universities can monitor the professors in their classes by the camera. If one of these professors makes a mistake, the university investigates the problem in order to increase the quality of education. For instance, the Amirkabir university published a journal paper in 2016 about monitoring professors could improve education. The university has tracked the math classes for three years and they have seen a major improvement in student’s not only grades but also their satisfaction.
Second, the university should make a system that students can give a grade to every professor. Also, the university must employ statistics staff in order to analyze the data and after that, they should talk to professors to improve their activities. For example, Tehran university has started this plan in 2000, so it can improve its ranking from 400 in Qs ranking to 200. When they are asked about their achievement, they state that after every semester, they collect the data and analyze them carefully. So, they can identify the professors who did not perform as far as expected. They send an email to professors and asked them to solve the problem for next semester. Besides, the university can increase the salaries by the number of papers that professors have published in journals or conferences.
To sum up, with all this taken into account, increasing the professor’s salaries can not be caused to effective education. Professors could be tracked in classes by the camera to monitor their quality of teaching. Additionally, the students should give grades to their professors so they could better their quality of activities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
University professors play significant r...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... make the quality of education better. First of all, the quality of professor’s...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly grades but also their satisfaction. Second, the university should make a sys...
^^^
Line 3, column 591, Rule ID: SEND_AN_EMAIL[1]
Message: Consider using 'email'.
Suggestion: email
...id not perform as far as expected. They send an email to professors and asked them to solve t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... published in journals or conferences. To sum up, with all this taken into acco...
^^^
Line 4, column 333, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uld better their quality of activities.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, second, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in addition, as well as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2167.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 399.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43107769424 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0264462889 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481203007519 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 683.1 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.878339514 48.9658058833 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.19047619 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.19047619048 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291613492002 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109651528045 0.076458572812 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564567126011 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211180866758 0.150856017488 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0985756972492 0.0645574589148 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.