Nowadays, a great number of people all over the world are using the Internet for many purposes during their lifetime. In this regard, some individuals believe that governments should offer Internet access to all of their people at no cost, while others hold the opposite supposition. When it comes to me, I concur with the latter group, stating that the Internet should not be free for all citizens. In what follows, I will elaborate on my viewpoint.
First of all, providing free Internet needs a vast amount of money, which can put pressure on governments’ budgets. To be more specific, when people know that the Internet is free, they start overusing the Internet, which needs more bandwidth and other related equipment. All of these infrastructures should be funded and investigated by governments, which costs expensively. For example, In the year 2005, my university, AmirKabir university, offered free Internet to all students. Due to this project, most students who did not interested in the Internet, start using it. In addition, a great number of pupils downloaded films and other media because of the free Internet. As a result, after two years, the university decided to limit Internet access because they could not afford free Internet costs.
Secondly, people would be addicted to the Internet due to the project of no cost Internet that is offered by governments. To elucidate, when governments suggest free Internet access to all of their people, every person starts using the Internet without worrying about finishing it or its costs. In this vein, people spend a vast amount of their time, searching on the Internet and reinforcing their addiction to it. Maybe my personal experience may shed more light on this matter. Two years ago, my father bought a six-month free Internet for us. Since we were not worried about finishing the Internet, we used it all day long, downloading a lot of movies and after that watching them. This caused me to be an addicted person and I suffered my eyes in this way. Also, because of my addiction, I could not study as well, and I give bad grades at school this year.
In conclusion, with all this taken into account, I firmly believe that providing free Internet access by governments is not a good idea. Not only will it put great pressure on governments' budgets, but also it will cause people to be addicted to Internet use.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 2, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...I will elaborate on my viewpoint. First of all, providing free Internet ne...
^^^
Line 3, column 795, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to free'
Suggestion: to free
...et access because they could not afford free Internet costs. Secondly, people w...
^^^^
Line 4, column 2, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...could not afford free Internet costs. Secondly, people would be addicted to th...
^^^
Line 6, column 2, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve bad grades at school this year. In conclusion, with all this taken into ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2060.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 406.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07389162562 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80358759012 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529556650246 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0390917687 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0952380952 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09523809524 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298269606611 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103267776253 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744012563547 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22256064001 0.150856017488 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381930152503 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.