Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Education is the backbone of a nation, without it the improvement and development of a society, country and world is quite impossible. The quality of education brings the desired good. Although the number of educated individual is skyrocketing but their quality is questionable. In order to improve the education quality, universities should budget more money for teachers’ salaries- with this prompt someone would agree, others would not. In my view, the increasing of professors salaries is positive prescience for quality teaching for the following two important reason.
The main reason is that the increasing salary helps teachers to engage more with their works. When, a teacher is satisfied with the money he earns then, him or her become more involved with his profession. For example, when I was studying in a graduate level, I saw difference by my eyes. The one group of teachers who have not enough research projects so, students were not interested to work under his supervision. In the same time, another group of teachers who got many grants, funds and often students were competition to get. As you can see that, the fund can make a noticeable difference in the same institution and at the same time these factors influence students the most to catch that professor.
Another reason is that it also helps teachers not to do any malpractices. It is true that, most of the professors are working part time another institution as guest lecturer to meet their needs. For this reason, the respective teachers or professors who assigned for the universities is devoid from his expertise. And in consequences, it harms the student quality education. For instance, during my university time, I saw many of our teachers were engaged to part time work in another institution. Moreover, the students from our university could not complete their respective projects, thesis and papers. As a result, it was harmed a lot during research and also job competition. This experience taught me that, giving needful salaries helps to curb the teacher to go outside for malpractices.
To wrap up, although it is acceptable for someone to argue about the increasing professors salaries but in reality these arguments is not convincing. The high emolument not only boost teachers availability for doing research works but also make them engaged in their assigned institution. So, the universities should increase the payment to their teachers for greater benefits of quality education
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...hat, most of the professors are working part time another institution as guest lecturer t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 460, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...aw many of our teachers were engaged to part time work in another institution. Moreover, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, then, for example, for instance, as a result, in my view, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2089.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20947630923 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90574310875 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506234413965 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 648.0 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9261984742 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9545454545 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2272727273 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.40909090909 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268047657052 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082488531517 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674270525318 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183986402575 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0831943153769 0.0645574589148 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.