Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is critically important for a university to spend fund wisely for the betterment of student education. In my opinion, I think it is a better way to improve the quality of education by raising the salaries of university professors. In the following essay, I intend to put forth my arguments to support my view.
To begin with, university lecturer are a valuable and highly respected people as they work hard for the betterment of a society. The raise in salaries of professors motivate them to give more. Some professors work with preserver and try to provide all of their knowledge they have to their students. Increase in their salaries also allow them to contribute more for students needs. For example, our chemistry professor taught us about the spectroscopy. She brought her personal spectroscopy machine and showed us practically so, that class able to understand it more clearly. She thoroughly taught us about the machine and how it works and allowed each and every student to take an observation in that device. This increased the student ability to learn better and developed their interest in the subject. This would not have been possible if the professors did not have enough income to spend for their students.
In addition, the future and career of students are dependent on university professors as they are the authority to pass or fail their students. Sometimes when a university does not pay worthy amount of money to their professors, they are likely to lose their interest in their career and sometimes get agitated. Also, they bother students in distinctive ways which hurt their education. To exemplify, our statistic professor was PhD. in Statistics and Data analytics and also a researcher. He was teaching students for more then ten years but his income was not according to his worth. Thus, he started to blackmail his students and deliberately fail some of his students so, he could earn some extra money. This was very frustrating as he mostly fails the freshman students however, which work hard. Thus, this example elucidates that university should spent more money on the salaries of professors.
In conclusion, I strongly agree with the statement that university should money on the salaries of professors to improve the quality of education. This is because, it keeps motivating the teacher to teach wholeheartedly, and because it brighten the students career.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 499, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rought her personal spectroscopy machine and showed us practically so, that class...
^^
Line 3, column 756, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... increased the student ability to learn better and developed their interest in the sub...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 51, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n, the future and career of students are dependent on university professors as th...
^^
Line 5, column 526, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...cher. He was teaching students for more then ten years but his income was not accord...
^^^^
Line 7, column 237, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'brightens'?
Suggestion: brightens
...to teach wholeheartedly, and because it brighten the students career.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, thus, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2014.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09873417722 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83263875794 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501265822785 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 9.59856630824 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3271388317 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5652173913 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1739130435 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13043478261 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256260504554 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829024620365 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0983720971271 0.0737576698707 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190626328371 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634022949534 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.