Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to be a member of a group than to be a leader of a group. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to be a member of a group than to be a leader of a group. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

During the course of human evolution, our species had to work together to achieve common goals, such as hunting in groups and building massive structures in the ancient world. with the advent in time, our communities became more and more complex and people had to choose specific roles for themselves. For some people, being a member in their society was good enough. However, others were more ambitious and wanted to be in leading positions. some individuals argue that being a member in a team is far better than being the leader Nevertheless, I believe that this opinion lacks coherence to certain extent. I feel this way for many potential reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.

To begin with, members of the management in any company or corporation in our modern society get higher compensation than regular employees. Although these kinds of positions come with even more responsibilities in theory, it's eventually a job with defined duties. For example, most organizations today provide senior managers and supervisors with comprehensive training with detailed steps on what procedures to initiate under a given circumstance. Therefore, it's better for talented people not to miss out on the benefits that they could gain while working in a leading post. these advantages that leaders get access to could be financial and non-financial.

On top of that, leaders get to learn exclusive skills that workers do not get exposed to. In other words, managers oftentimes are the folks that deal with any problems facing the company. Consequently, they get to see all the ins and outs of an issue to devise countermeasures. In addition, the firm offers them extra coaching to be able to handle difficulties. Thus, they will have an opportunity to apply what they learn and improve their experience. Furthermore, the skill of leading a group to accomplishing tasks is extremely valuable and the only way to acquire this capability is through practicing in similar roles.

To sum up, In my perspective, it's actually preferable to be the leader of the group than to be just a contributing member for the reasons mentioned above.

Votes
Average: 8.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
This essay topic by users:
Post date Users Rates Content
2019-12-30 bishoy 86 Read full essay
2019-04-10 ranarano 60 Read full essay
2019-04-10 ranarano 66 Read full essay
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: DURING_THE_COURSE_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'During'.
Suggestion: During
During the course of human evolution, our species had to wor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: With
...assive structures in the ancient world. with the advent in time, our communities bec...
^^^^
Line 1, column 444, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
... and wanted to be in leading positions. some individuals argue that being a member i...
^^^^
Line 5, column 224, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...h even more responsibilities in theory, its eventually a job with defined duties. F...
^^^
Line 5, column 579, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...d gain while working in a leading post. these advantages that leaders get access to c...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, i feel, in addition, such as, in other words, to begin with, to sum up, on top of that

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1806.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 352.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13068181818 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94515416319 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610795454545 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7106020394 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.333333333 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8888888889 5.45110844103 200% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262334947282 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720002976024 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676549935345 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171792659032 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0753318314864 0.0645574589148 117% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.