Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a large city. Use specific reasons and examples to develop your essay.
What a pleasant time of my life was my school years, which were spent, where an endless pine forest meat blue sky and cleanest streams run out from high mountains in one rive, which is going through parent’s neighborhood. As for me, There is nothing better, then grew up in the countryside for two compelling reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, adults and children differ in necessities from each other. The needs of individuals after fourteen or sixteen years are increasing. For example, they are looking for university or college education, interesting work in a world-renowned corporation or another way to fulfill their strong ambitions. However, a school with hobby-circles and a children’s play garden exist in the countryside as well as in big cities. Moreover, I observe a tendency through patents to taught their children on their own. To illustrate the idea, I would like to notice, that I graduated from a village school and an art school as well. Further, the knowledge afforded me to enroll in an architectural university. In my course, there were students from the village as well. Quality of school education is not a lot different.
The second reason why the countryside is more suitable for children’s growth is that cities full of destruction, noise, and external informational pollution. A surrounded by nature child earns creative skills, a sense of harmony and the ability to love every dweller of our beautiful planet. For instance, my snowboard instructor was born and spent his early childhood in a camp of mountaineers. He is working now in one of the biggest ski resorts in Russia. I admire how passionate is he for local forest habitats! He truly takes care of our small neighbors and his interesting stories about animals and birds' behavior encouraged me to be aware and pay attention to my interaction with the environment, to reduce the consumption of goods and be in hormone with nature. Such quality should be a fundamental, crucial feature of every human, due to which we can built responsible, kind and conscious society.
To sum it up, countryside is a perfect place to grow children there. This is everything what a child need in his or her age, and because nurture is the best place to find balance, embracing how you are and make the word a bit better.
- It has been said Not everything that is learned is contained in books Compare and contrast knowledge gained from experience with knowledge gained from books In your opinion which source is more important Why 43
- A teacher s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught 78
- People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries. 76
- Some people say that computers have made life easier and more convenient. Other people say that computers have made life more complex and stressful. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a large city Use specific reasons and examples to develop your essay 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 861, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'build'
...ure of every human, due to which we can built responsible, kind and conscious society...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, moreover, second, so, then, well, as for, for example, for instance, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1947.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92911392405 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94314658844 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610126582278 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.0366379856 48.9658058833 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.473684211 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7894736842 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94736842105 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178782435018 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503799782851 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069240861507 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104726594045 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0209968808778 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.