None of the factors can resist people from exploring things at any age. Some people believe that older people can take risks due to having experiences, while others put forward the opinion that youngsters are more capable of exploring new things. In my opinion, I totally agree that young age is a better period for exploring new ideas. I feel this way for too many reasons, which I will explore further in my essay.
To begin with, teenagers can easily adapt to unfamiliar tasks due to updated knowledge. To explain broadly, they can research before getting through it. On the other hand, older people do not prefer to get information because of having few details; as a result, they can fail sometimes. My personal experience is a compelling example of it. When I was in college, I preferred to visit new restaurants. In addition, I looked upon reviews for new places before visiting, and it gave me a clear picture. After that, I was willing to visit; otherwise, I do not believe in wasting my money. On the flip side, my father did not prefer to look at the feedback from others. For this reason, many times, his experience was not worthy even though he had spent a lot of money. From this particular case, I can admit that teenagers are better at researching to explore things well without wasting money.
Secondly, youngsters have more physical endurance as compared to older people, so they can stretch without any constraints. Whereas older people have to be selective when it comes to taking risks; otherwise, it will damage the body parts. For instance, last year, I was thinking of trying skydiving for the first time. At that time, my mother was also excited to try the activity with me. Nevertheless, when we reached the office, there was a signboard for not allowing people diagnosed with heart conditions. Thus, my mother was excluded due to having heart issues. Moreover, I tried skydiving alone, and my mother did not fulfill her wish. If she had experienced the activity at an early age, she would have fulfilled her wish. Therefore, I can admit that young people have the physical endurance to complete the task.
In conclusion, young people are better candidates for exploring new things; they research more and know. In addition, they are physically fit for taking risks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch I will explore further in my essay. To begin with, teenagers can easily adap...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ore things well without wasting money. Secondly, youngsters have more physical ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ysical endurance to complete the task. In conclusion, young people are better c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ey are physically fit for taking risks.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, while, for instance, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1904.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 394.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83248730964 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5777757317 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543147208122 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 21.0 9.59856630824 219% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.2134719593 48.9658058833 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.16 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.76 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72 5.45110844103 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271250579443 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748072650876 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715175632614 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199390635548 0.150856017488 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0803639104935 0.0645574589148 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.