Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours

Working was always a big concept for human beings. There are several aspects of different jobs to talk about, but one of the most important things is finding the best timing. For having a solution we should consider so many critical parameters. I believe working five days a week is much better than three days a week, and I have reasons to support my point of view.
To begin with, having very long work hours in a day can cause serious physical and mental health issues. Workers must always have enough time to recover themselves and avoid too much tension otherwise, they are going to get sick. Employers must consider their employees' health situation and care about them and treat them as their own family. Workers must always have enough quality time to spend with their family and friends.
Furthermore, not having a good time break leads to less productivity. When we have an optimum work hour and then a sufficient break time after the job we can rest our body and mind. So that the next day we will be fresh and full of energy, which leads us to have our tasks done in the best way possible. But if we have to be at work late, three days a week, in the final hours of workdays we are going to lose our momentum and everyone will be bored and tired. So the total effect is going to drop and this manner is practically impossible.
To wrap it up, I extremely suggest that going to work for five days a week is a much better working approach. Not only is it healthier, but also it can lead to better work efficiency.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, then, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 52.1666666667 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1244.0 1977.66487455 63% => OK
No of words: 282.0 407.700716846 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.41134751773 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28709934179 2.67179642975 86% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567375886525 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 618.680645161 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.4849453742 48.9658058833 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.9333333333 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.45110844103 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318561950458 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105868204135 0.076458572812 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0851621134742 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200774336445 0.150856017488 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606891816249 0.0645574589148 94% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 11.7677419355 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 58.1214874552 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.3 10.9000537634 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 86.8835125448 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.